- By Joshua Keating
Joshua Keating is associate editor at Foreign Policy and the editor of the Passport blog. He has worked as a researcher, editorial assistant, and deputy Web editor since joining the FP staff in 2007. In addition to being featured in Foreign Policy, his writing has been published by the Washington Post, Newsweek International, Radio Prague, the Center for Defense Information, and Romania's Adevarul newspaper. He has appeared as a commentator on CNN International, C-Span, ABC News, Al Jazeera, NPR, BBC radio, and others. A native of Brooklyn, New York, he studied comparative politics at Oberlin College.
Those cheese-eating French are already giving Barack Obama a hard time. No…really.
Apparently one of George W. Bush’s last acts as president was to triple tariffs on French roquefort cheese. This was meant as retaliation for the longstanding French ban on U.S. beef imports. But as Charles Bremner notes, many French were quick to see it as Bush’s final shot at the “cheese-eating surrender monkeys” who had so aggravated him during the run-up to the Iraq war.
French roquefort producers, including anti-globalization icon and dairy farmer Jose Bove, are protesting the move to “hold roquefort hostage” and are demanding that Obama reverse Bush’s decision. The French parliament is debating a measure to slap tariffs on Coca-Cola in “symbol against symbol” retaliation. As a not-so-subtle hint, the governor of the roquefort-producing Mid-Pyrenees region even sent Obama a deluxe box of roquefort (shown above) as a welcoming gift. Repealing the beef ban is out of the question for health reasons, say officials.
The last thing Obama wants right now is to get into a trade war with France over a last-minute decision by his predecessor, particularly when he’s looking for French cooperation on far more pressing issues. But even the farmers seem to realize that the “cheese wars” are not particularly high on Obama’s list right now. “The boy must have a lot of priorities,” acknowledged the head of one agricultural union.
Umm…yeah. I would say so. And you probably shouldn’t be calling him “boy” either.
Photo: PASCAL PAVANI/AFP/Getty Images