- By Jordana TimermanJordana Timerman is a researcher at Foreign Policy.
The border between Peru and Chile became increasingly fraught Wednesday — with France stepping into the fray by (inadvertently?) publishing a map that seems to side with Peru.
Peru and Chile are awaiting a ruling from the International Court of Justice, to decide the maritime boundaries between the two. In the mean time, Peruvian media is crowing with delight at the French National Geographic Institute’s slip-up, saying “If it is not a prediction, it is at least an encouraging fact.”
But Chile’s diplomats will not let the issue rest, government officials pressed the Gallic institute for answers, while at the same time assuring their people that this cannot influence The Hague’s final decision.
The French chancery today put out a statement assuring their neutrality in the matter, saying the map in question has “no official value.”
Tensions have been running high for a while, with Peru protesting Chilean military demonstrations as threatening and proposing a regional non-aggression pact in order to stop a Latin American arms race.
More seriously, Bolivia is staying out of this dispute, although it too has a strong interest in two countries’ ocean borders. Chile and Bolivia are negotiating to give the latter country sea access for the first time in 140 years, having lost its ocean view in the 19th century War of the Pacific, in which Chile annexed portions of Peru and Bolivia.
Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and a senior editor at The National Interest. Prior to Fletcher, he taught at the University of Chicago and the University of Colorado at Boulder. Drezner has received fellowships from the German Marshall Fund of the United States, the Council on Foreign Relations, and Harvard University. He has previously held positions with Civic Education Project, the RAND Corporation, and the Treasury Department.| Daniel W. Drezner |