- By Daniel W. Drezner
Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and a senior editor at The National Interest. Prior to Fletcher, he taught at the University of Chicago and the University of Colorado at Boulder. Drezner has received fellowships from the German Marshall Fund of the United States, the Council on Foreign Relations, and Harvard University. He has previously held positions with Civic Education Project, the RAND Corporation, and the Treasury Department.
Both the Guardian and the New York Times have stories today suggesting that the Sino-American relationship is on the mend. Last night Barack Obama and Hu Jintao spoke on the phone for, like, a whole hour. It was such a good chat that Air Force One sat on the tarmac at Andrew Air Force base for ten minutes so Obama could finish the call.
There has been an appreciable shift in the past week. Hu pledged to attend the Obama’s nuclear proliferation summit a few weeks from now. U.S. oficials sound confident that China is on board for another round of United Nations sanctions against Iran — though the negotiations for that could take a while. It also appears that China has not followed through on sanctions against U.S. companies for arms sales to Taiwan. On the American side, at a minimum, the Treasury Department has deferred submitting its report to Congress on Chinese currency
manipulation practices for a little while. The headline for this Vikas Bajaj story suggests that Hu’s visit "may signal easing by China on currency," though there’s no actual evidence in the story backing up that asserrtion.
1) Economic tensions. Tim Geithner, the US Treasury Secretary, has just publicly expressed his concern about the very high levels of US unemployment and many American economists, including in the administration, blame America’s problems in large part on “Chinese mercantalism”. If the Chinese refuse to let the RMB appreciate, or even allow only a modest appreciation, then a clash will eventually happen.
2) Climate change: Remember Copenhagen? There is no sign that the two nations are going to move any closer on this most divisive issue.
3) Iran – A new pacakge of sanctions could head this one off. But they are unlikely to be strong enough to satisfy the US or – let us not forget – to achieve their objective.
4) The mega-trend in the background is the rise of China and the relative decline of the US – and the expression of this will be the gradual challenge to American military hegemony in the Pacific. This will not be a comfortable process.
So look beyond today’s headlines. I can assure you, the Chinese do.
Well….. let’s think about this for a second. The first three issues are all about more than the bilateral Sino-American relationship. On the economic front, there’s evidence that China has ticked off other countries beyond the United States. On Iran, the U.S. was careful to line up support on sanctions from the Britain, France and Russia, leaving China as the sole P-5 holdout. And on climate change, at a minimum, China came out of Copenhagen looking like something of a bully.
My take of the past six months is that the Chinese overplayed their hand very badly across an array of issues, irking not just the United States but other significant countries. In response, the U.S. has been able to exploit multilateral resentment as a way of
teaching Beijing about the security dilemma putting subtle pressure on China to moderate its tone and actions. As for the mega-trend, well, that’s happening, but it’s still quite a ways off.
Rachman still makes some decent points. There are fundamental conflicts of interest. Going beyond the issues Rachman mentions, there’s also minor stuff like the fact that China and America’s domestic regimes look a wee bit different.
For now, however, much of China’s recent bluster turned out to be self-defeating. What will be interesting to see is how both Washington and Beijing will learn from the recent spot of unpleasantness.
UPDATE: Hmm…. this Financial Times story by Jamil Anderlini and Alan Beattie is very interesting:
Beijing may adjust its policy of pegging its currency to the dollar provided a visit this month by Chinese President Hu Jintao to Washington goes smoothly, according to a top adviser to China’s central bank.
Li Daokui, a professor at Tsinghua university and a member of China’s central bank monetary policy committee, said as long as the US respected China’s “core interests” the currency disagreement could be easily solved.
Barack Obama and his Chinese counterpart talked for an hour on Thursday evening, during which Mr Hu stressed that the “proper handling of Taiwan and Tibet” was the biggest factor in Sino-US ties, according to China’s state media.
“As long as this is understood, everything else will be easy to handle and we will find the key to unlock the exchange rate problem,” Mr Li told the Financial Times.