- By Josh Rogin
Josh Rogin covers national security and foreign policy and writes the daily Web column The Cable. His column appears bi-weekly in the print edition of The Washington Post. He can be reached for comments or tips at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Previously, Josh covered defense and foreign policy as a staff writer for Congressional Quarterly, writing extensively on Iraq, Afghanistan, Guantánamo Bay, U.S.-Asia relations, defense budgeting and appropriations, and the defense lobbying and contracting industries. Prior to that, he covered military modernization, cyber warfare, space, and missile defense for Federal Computer Week Magazine. He has also served as Pentagon Staff Reporter for the Asahi Shimbun, Japan's leading daily newspaper, in its Washington, D.C., bureau, where he reported on U.S.-Japan relations, Chinese military modernization, the North Korean nuclear crisis, and more.
A graduate of George Washington University's Elliott School of International Affairs, Josh lived in Yokohama, Japan, and studied at Tokyo's Sophia University. He speaks conversational Japanese and has reported from the region. He has also worked at the House International Relations Committee, the Embassy of Japan, and the Brookings Institution.
Josh's reporting has been featured on CNN, MSNBC, C-Span, CBS, ABC, NPR, WTOP, and several other outlets. He was a 2008-2009 National Press Foundation's Paul Miller Washington Reporting Fellow, 2009 military reporting fellow with the Knight Center for Specialized Journalism and the 2011 recipient of the InterAction Award for Excellence in International Reporting. He hails from Philadelphia and lives in Washington, D.C.
The United States may be the largest donor of foreign assistance in the world, but it ranks among the lowest in terms of the quality and effectiveness of its aid, according to a new report.
The Center for Global Development (CGD), in cooperation with the Brookings Institution, released its "Quality of ODA Assessment" report Tuesday, which assesses the aid provided to 23 countries by more than 150 aid countries to determine how much value they are getting for their foreign aid money. Although the United States does poorly overall when compared to other countries or multilateral organizations, some agencies rate better than others: The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Defense Department get poor marks, while the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) does much better.
U.S. foreign assistance has suffered by attempting to address too many of the world’s problems — a challenge that has spread operations too thin to specialize in any one field. "USAID doesn’t build any comparative advantage the way many other donors do in any particular specialization or country," explained CGD President Nancy Birdsall, speaking about the report with The Cable. "Over many years USAID has been subjected to more kinds of pressures that have made it less and less efficient, particularly on fostering institutions."
The study looked at 30 separate, measurable indicators and evaluated them in terms of four dimensions: maximizing efficiency (how smartly the money is distributed), fostering institutions (whether the money is helping host governments), reducing the burden on recipient countries (how much the host countries need to do to get the money), and transparency and learning (how much we know about how the aid is being spent).
CDG and Brookings even set up an interactive web tool that allows one to compare the results of different countries and different agencies.
The report is based on data from 2008, but CGD plans to update the information when new data becomes available.
However, Birdsall was optimistic that the current administration was making progress in improving the way the United States distributes aid. "The Obama administration has done a very good job on articulating what needs to be done," she said, referring to the president’s speech at the U.N. General Assembly and the recent U.S. Global Leadership Coalition panel with Cabinet Secretaries Hillary Clinton, Robert Gates, and Timothy Geithner. She also said that the administration’s recently completed overall development policy review holds out the promise of improvements in the future.
But the rebuilding of USAID, which saw its ranks fall from 15,000 to 3,000 over the last two decades, will take years of painstaking work. Birdsall is also calling on the administration to designate a lead U.S. agency for some of its largest aid initiatives, such as the food security and global health programs.
"Nothing much yet has happened," she said. "The proof of the pudding is in the eating, not in the talking. The direction is right, the rhetoric is good, let’s see what the action is."
Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and a senior editor at The National Interest. Prior to Fletcher, he taught at the University of Chicago and the University of Colorado at Boulder. Drezner has received fellowships from the German Marshall Fund of the United States, the Council on Foreign Relations, and Harvard University. He has previously held positions with Civic Education Project, the RAND Corporation, and the Treasury Department.| Daniel W. Drezner |