- By Daniel W. Drezner
Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and a senior editor at The National Interest. Prior to Fletcher, he taught at the University of Chicago and the University of Colorado at Boulder. Drezner has received fellowships from the German Marshall Fund of the United States, the Council on Foreign Relations, and Harvard University. He has previously held positions with Civic Education Project, the RAND Corporation, and the Treasury Department.
[NOTE: This was written on Thursday, but I foolishly forgot to ‘publish" it. It’s still relevant, however — ed.]
Longtime readers know I’m fond of the phrase "going Vizzini" when policymakers or reporters keep using a word incorrectly.
Today, I’m adding "going Goodman" in honor of The Simpson‘s Brad Goodman. In the episode Bart’s Inner Child, he said, "There’s no trick to it, it’s just a simple trick!" I hereby award the Goodman to anyone who says something to the effect of, "We’re not asking that you do A, just do A instead!"
For today’s Goodman, let’s go to the New York Times and Israeli ambassador to the United States Michael Oren’s op-ed explaining Netanyahu’s latest offer to the Palestinians:
Benjamin Netanyahu, for the Palestinians to recognize Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people, enabling his government to consider extending the moratorium on West Bank construction. "Such a step by the Palestinian Authority would be a confidence-building measure," Mr. Netanyahu explained, noting that Israel was not demanding recognition as a prerequisite for direct talks. It would "open a new horizon of hope as well as trust among broad parts of the Israeli public."…
For Palestinians, recognizing Israel as a Jewish state… means accepting that the millions of them residing in Arab countries would be resettled within a future Palestinian state and not within Israel, which their numbers would transform into a Palestinian state in all but name. Reconciling with the Jewish state means that the two-state solution is not a two-stage solution leading, as many Palestinians hope, to Israel’s dissolution.
While the cliché is that the Palestinians never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity, that’s not what Oren and Netanyahu are offering. They’re offering two months of doing nothing on settlements in return for Palestinians giving up the right of return, which is one of the core bargaining issues in any final settlement negotiations.
This might have the distinction of being one of the worst bargains ever offered in the history of Israeli/Palestinian negotiations. True, everyone knows that, eventually, the Palestinians will have to give up the right of return for there to be a final peace. Everyone also knows, however, that the only way that happens in a politically viable manner is if it’s part of a package deal on the final status of the occupied territories.
Regardless of what Oren is writing in his op-ed, this offer amounts to the following: "We’re happy to enter into final status negotiations, just as soon as you throw in your biggest bargaining chip to get what you want in final status negotiations."
If Oren and Netanyahu think they can cadge it from the Palestinians in return for a two-month moratorium on settlements, well, then they win this week’s Brad Goodman Award.
Joshua Keating is associate editor at Foreign Policy and the editor of the Passport blog. He has worked as a researcher, editorial assistant, and deputy Web editor since joining the FP staff in 2007. In addition to being featured in Foreign Policy, his writing has been published by the Washington Post, Newsweek International, Radio Prague, the Center for Defense Information, and Romania's Adevarul newspaper. He has appeared as a commentator on CNN International, C-Span, ABC News, Al Jazeera, NPR, BBC radio, and others. A native of Brooklyn, New York, he studied comparative politics at Oberlin College.| Passport |