- By David BoscoDavid Bosco is an associate professor at Indiana University's School of Global and International Studies. He is the author of books on the U.N. Security Council and the International Criminal Court, and is at work on a new book about governance of the oceans.
A source inside the World Bank sends along this nugget on the simmering question of whether and when the World Bank will get a new president:
Rumors are running wild that RBZ [Robert Zoellick] was told earlier this week by the White House that they would like to see him go. RBZ has called on short notice a meeting with the Board for this morning – which is very unusual. So people are putting two and two together.
This meshes with what the well-informed Nancy Birdsall at the Center for Global Development wrote earlier this week:
The insider talk on the next World Bank president is heating up, with rumors that Robert Zoellick will formally initiate the process in the United States system shortly by indicating to the White House that he will step down at the end of his term in June.
Then begins the collision in the White House between its promises to the global community and political realities at home. The collision boils down to the question of whether or not the White House will try to ensure that the longstanding U.S. privilege of picking World Bank presidents prevails once more—arguing that the Europeans after all got their way on another European at the IMF last summer.
Formally speaking, the selection process for next Bank president will be open to all, including non-Americans. The key question is whether that process will simply be a facade behind which operates the traditional American privilege.
Update: World Bank is now confirming that Zoellick will step down at the end of his term. The Bank released a statement that includes this from Zoellick himself:
I’m honored to have led such a world class institution with so many talented and exceptional people. Together we have focused on supporting developing countries to navigate crises and adjust to global economic shifts. The Bank has recognized that we live in a world of multiple poles of growth where traditional concepts of the "Third World" are now outdated and where developing countries have a key role to play as growth drivers and responsible stakeholders. At the same time, we’ve scaled up our support to poor people, countries, and communities and shown that the Bank can be an indispensable innovator, catalyst, and driver of a modernized multilateralism.
I’m very pleased that when the world needed the Bank to step up, our shareholders responded with expanded resources and support for key reforms that made us quicker, more effective and more open. The Bank is now strong, healthy and well positioned for new challenges, and so it is a natural time for me to move on and support new leadership.
More: A well-placed source is pushing back on the report from my original Bank correspondent that Zoellick was told by the White House that he had to go or was in any way pushed out. "That’s 110 percent wrong, there’s no grey area." This source would not offer a view as to whether the administration would have allowed Zoellick serve a second term, but insisted that the decision was his own.