How exactly does Sergei Lavrov define ‘provocative’?

How exactly does Sergei Lavrov define ‘provocative’?

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has an interesting definition of the word “provocative.”  After meeting with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at the U.N. this week, Lavrov commented on March 14 that the recent resumption of U.S.-Georgia military exercises “seems somewhat provocative.”

This might make sense if only Russia wasn’t organizing military exercises of its own in the Caucasus. In December 2011, Russia announced a new strategic command-and-staff exercise, “Caucasus 2012,” to take place in September 2012. The purpose is to prepare for a possible Israeli attack on Iran (and the potential repercussions in the Caucasus region). The exercises are to involve all areas of the armed forces, and will take place not only in the Russian territories of the North Caucasus, but also in neighboring Armenia, as well as the Georgian breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia (over which the 2008 war was fought).

It also conveniently occurs right before the scheduled parliamentary elections in Georgia for October 2012. The Georgian Foreign Ministry is obviously skeptical of these “military exercises” on its borders, claiming Russia is “seeking to instigate a permanent state of tension” in the region.

Then again, Russian foreign affairs rhetoric isn’t exactly known for its consistency. Last year, during the NATO decision-making to provide the Libyan rebels with military assistance against Qadaffi, Russia’s NATO ambassador Dimitri Rogozin commented that creating a no-fly zone over Libyan air space was “a serious interference into the domestic affairs of another country.” Similar words came from Putin himself, who described the NATO mission as a “medieval call for a crusade … [that] allows intervention in a sovereign state.”

Ah, Putin condemning foreign military intervention in a sovereign state. How quickly he forgot his intentions in 2008.