Islamic scholars are prepared to answer questions and issue fatwas on almost any realm of modern life. Sometimes, it can get a little kinky.
- By Joshua E. KeatingJoshua E. Keating is an associate editor at Foreign Policy.
Geologically induced accidental incestuous penetration
Ayatollah Gilani, Iran
As Karim Sadjadpour recounts in his new article for Foreign Policy, an obscure cleric known as Ayatollah Gilani had a popular television show in the early days of the Iranian revolution during which he would opine upon the halal or haram status of various outlandish scenarios. His best-remembered went like this:
Imagine you are a young man sleeping in your bedroom. In the bedroom directly below, your aunt lies asleep. Now imagine that an earthquake happens that collapses your floor, causing you to fall directly on top of her. For the sake of argument, let’s assume that you’re both nude, and you’re erect, and you land with such perfect precision on top of her that you unintentionally achieve intercourse. Is the child of such an encounter halalzadeh (legitimate) or haramzadeh (a bastard)?
(It’s halalzadeh in case you were wondering.)
In another famous broadcast, Gilani allegedly recalled being sexually aroused in the back seat of his chauffeured car after catching site of a few inches of a woman’s exposed ankle on the street. Naughty.
Eating your animal sex partner
Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini
In his 1961 book, A Clarification of Questions, the supreme leader aimed to set out his position on 3,000 questions of everyday life, though “everyday” might be pushing it for some of them. Most famously, the ayatollah ruled that “If a person has intercourse with a cow, a sheep, or a camel, their urine and dung become impure and drinking their milk will be unlawful.”
The ayatollah also ruled that “Industrial alcohol used for painting doors, tables, chairs, etc., is clean if one does not know it was made of something inebriating” and, as apparently a fan of rudimentary in vitro fertilization, that “It is not unlawful to introduce a man’s semen into the uterus of his wife with devices such as suction cups.”
Dr. Izzat Atiya, lecturer at Cairo’s al-Azhar University
In 2007, Atiya was responding to a question of whether it’s permissible for a woman to work alone with a man in an office setting, or reveal her hair in front of him. His not-so-elegant solution was that such an arrangement would be acceptable if the woman fed the man “directly from her breast” at least five times, thus making them essentially family members.
“Breast feeding an adult puts an end to the problem of the private meeting, and does not ban marriage,” he ruled. “A woman at work can take off the veil or reveal her hair in front of someone whom she breastfed.”
Atiya was widely mocked for the ruling and withdrew the fatwa after he was disciplined by his university, blaming it on “bad interpretation.” The controversy prompted Egypt’s minister of religious affairs to call for future fatwas to “be compatible with logic and human nature.”
Rashad Hassan Khalil, former dean of Islamic law at Cairo’s al-Azhar University
“We don’t have to take our clothes off to have a good time,” promised a U.S. pop hit of the 1980s. Khalil would apparently agree. In 2006, the scholar ruled that being completely naked during sex would invalidate a couple’s marriage.
Other scholars quickly disputed the ruling, saying that “anything that can bring spouses closer to each other” should be encouraged. Yet another scholar suggested it was OK for the couple to be naked — as long as they avoided looking at each other’s genitals.
There seems to be a vigorous debate among scholars about oral sex, both for men and women. The popular Egyptian cleric Yusuf al-Qaradawi has declared that “it is lawful for the husband to perform cunnilingus on his wife, or a wife to perform the similar act for her husband [fellatio], and there is no wrong in doing so. But if sucking leads to releasing semen, then it is makruh [blameworthy], but there is no decisive evidence [to forbid it] … especially if the wife agrees with it or achieves orgasm by practicing it.”
Other clerics disagree, such as Muhammed Saeed of the popular South African Islamic advice website Madressah Arabia Islamia, arguing that “It does not behoove a Muslim to use for such a filthy purpose the same mouth that he/she uses for the tilaawat of the Qur’aan.”
In response to a question from a reader about the permissibility of oral sex with a condom, the website IslamWeb noncommittally advises that, “We cannot authoritatively say that this act is forbidden or that the person who does so is sinful, especially with the use of a condom which prevents the impurity from touching the mouth.”
Men can’t masturbate … unless they really, really want to
TV theologian Yusuf al-Qaradawi
According to Qaradawi, a man is permitted to masturbate under two conditions: If he doesn’t have the means to marry, or if he fears that he might otherwise commit fornication or adultery.
One could be cynical about this advice and assume it amounts to “don’t masturbate unless you want to.” But Qaradawi advises that before masturbating, young men with wondering minds should first try fasting or admiring “natural things such as flowers and beautiful scenery, which do not stimulate one sexually.”
Getting frisky in the vegetable aisle
Imam Abdelbari Zemzami
This Moroccan cleric has become well known in recent years for weighing in on matters of the flesh. But he recently raised some eyebrows among both secularists and religious conservatives with a fatwa on female masturbation, which he said was permissible for women who are widowed, divorced, or had lost hope that they would ever have sexual relations with a man.
“A woman can get much benefit from these vegetables and other elongated objects,” the imam said, listing pestles, bottles, and root vegetables among other suggested implements.
Girls on bikes
Mufti Arshad Faruqui, Darul Uloom fatwa department, Lucknow, India
A scholar at Saudi Arabia’s top religious council got a lot of attention last year for warning that allowing women to drive cars would lead to the “end of virginity.”
But the chairman of a renowned Islamic seminary in India took aim last year at an even more insidious threat: Girls on bicycles. “When a grown-up girl goes cycling outside her house, it is bound to result in bepardagi [undue exposure],” he said. “Even medical science has given us evidence to believe that cycling is not good for adolescent girls, physically. Apart from affecting their femininity, it is harmful for their body structure.”
In response, Lucknow’s main imam urged Faruqui to “desist from issuing such impractical advice.”
Too sexy for this tennis court
Haseeb-ul-hasan Siddiqui of India’s Sunni Ulema Board
India’s best ever female tennis star and the first Indian to ever win a World Tennis Association event, Sania Mirza, became a huge celebrity in her home country. But, as Mirza came from a devout Muslim family, the standard women’s tennis attire of short skirts and tight T-shirts vexed religious authorities, and in 2005, a group of Muslim clerics issued a fatwa urging her to cover up.
“The dress she wears on the tennis courts not only doesn’t cover large parts of her body but leaves nothing to the imagination,” said Siddiqui. The board suggested that she wear long tunics and headscarves like those sported by Iranian badminton players.
Cholil Ridwan, the Indonesia Council of Ulema
Lady Gaga might not be the first pop star to upset religious conservatives, but her condemnation from Indonesia’s top religious authority prior to a planned concert in the country was notable for its specificity. “She is from the West, and she often shows her aurat [genitalia] when performing,” Ridwan said, taking offense to the “Bad Romance” singer’s “revealing outfits and sexualized dance moves.”
Just in case you were wondering how such a pious religious authority came to know so much about Gaga’s routine, he claimed he had never seen one of her performances … but was aware of her “reputation.”
Blake Hounshell is managing editor at Foreign Policy, having formerly been Web editor. Hounshell oversees ForeignPolicy.com and has commissioned and edited numerous cover stories for the print magazine, including National Magazine Award finalist "Why Do They Hate Us?" by Mona Eltahawy. He also edits The Cable, FP's first foray into daily original reporting, and was editor of Colum Lynch's Turtle Bay, which in 2011 won a National Magazine award for best reporting in a digital format.
Blake joined Foreign Policy in 2006 after living in Cairo, where he studied Arabic, missed his Steelers finally win one for the thumb, and worked for the Ibn Khaldun Center for Development Studies. Blake was a 2011 finalist for the Livingston Awards prize for young journalists for his reporting on the Arab uprisings, and his Twitter feed was named one of Time magazine's "140 Best Twitter Feeds of 2011." Under his leadership, in 2008, Passport, FP's flagship blog, won Media Industry Newsletter's "Best of the Web" award in the blog category. Along with Elizabeth Dickinson, he edited Southern Tiger: Chile's Fight for a Democratic and Prosperous Future, the memoirs of former Chilean president Ricardo Lagos, published by Palgrave Macmillan in 2012.
A graduate of Yale University, Blake speaks mangled Arabic and French, is an avid runner, and lives in Washington with his wife, musician Sandy Choi, and their toddler, David. Follow him on Twitter @blakehounshell.| Passport |
Joshua Keating is associate editor at Foreign Policy and the editor of the Passport blog. He has worked as a researcher, editorial assistant, and deputy Web editor since joining the FP staff in 2007. In addition to being featured in Foreign Policy, his writing has been published by the Washington Post, Newsweek International, Radio Prague, the Center for Defense Information, and Romania's Adevarul newspaper. He has appeared as a commentator on CNN International, C-Span, ABC News, Al Jazeera, NPR, BBC radio, and others. A native of Brooklyn, New York, he studied comparative politics at Oberlin College.| Passport |