Five places where Santa really does have to watch his back.
- By Elizabeth F. RalphElizabeth Ralph is a researcher at Foreign Policy.
It’s that time of year again when Americans head home, gather with family and friends, snuggle up by the fire, and watch cable news hosts inform us about the secular liberal assault against Christmas. To these unhappy warriors, it seems every “Happy Holidays” sign, religiously neutral public display, or White House Christmas Card featuring the president’s dog is a slap in the face to America’s Christian values.
Fox host Bill O’Reilly — the undisputed champion of Americans’ right to tinsel, crèches, and holiday-specific corporate signage — recently exhorted his viewers to “stand up and fight against this secular progressivism that wants to diminish the Christmas holiday.”
“We have to start to fight back against these people,” he averred.
Evidently, the warnings of O’Reilly and his fellow Christmas defenders are working. A recent poll by the left-leaning group Public Policy Polling found that 47 percent of Americans believe that there is indeed a “War on Christmas.”
Never mind that a quick glance at any network commercial break or a casual stroll through a department store should reveal that the Christmas spirit is alive and well in America. But that’s not true everywhere. Here’s a look at five places where the War on Christmas is all too real.
Cameron Spencer/Getty Images
This Central Asian dictatorship is one country Santa will be skipping this year. According to the Associated Press, local media reported earlier this month that President Islam Karimov’s regime has banned the local version of Santa Claus from television.
The gag order reportedly applies to Ded Moroz (Father Frost), his young female side-kick Snegurochka, and several other folklore characters known throughout the former Soviet world, including the infamous wood witch Baba Yaga. The ban is an attempt to discourage the celebration of holidays and folk figures deemed too Russian or too Western. According to the new decree, Christmas trees are allowed on TV, but only if they are small and pictured at a distance.
Karimov’s nationalist, Asian-centric crusade has also targeted some other favorite holidays. Santa’s blacklisting is similar to the government’s 2005 ban on celebrating New Years Eve in the capitol’s public schools. (Uzbekistan’s New Year’s Eve traditionally falls on the vernal equinox.) The government also canceled Valentine’s Day celebrations this year, replacing them with “organized readings of poems by medieval Mughal emperor Babur.” How romantic.
NATALIA KOLESNIKOVA/AFP/Getty Images
The officially atheist Hermit Kingdom does not permit the celebration of Christmas, and isn’t too thrilled about South Korea’s deeply devout Christians celebrating either. Though North Korea’s constitution says it guarantees freedom of religion, at the time of Kim Jong Il’s death, human rights activists estimated that there were between 50,000 and 70,000 Christians in North Korean labor camps. And those are the lucky ones — missionaries caught distributing bibles, and anyone caught worshipping secretly can be tortured or executed, or both. So far, Kim Jong Un has turned out to be just as intolerant as his father. One woman told the New York Times in October, “If the government finds out I’m reading the Bible, I’m dead.”
North Korea is so worried about Santa and his little helpers that last year, the People’s Democratic Republic warned of “unexpected consequences” if the South Korean government allowed a Christian group to light a 100-foot tall Christmas tree-shaped tower just two miles from the North Korean border. The tree tower had been around for years, but as relations between the two countries improved under the South’s conciliatory “sunshine policy,” the tree was left unlit at Christmastime. Then, in December 2010, with tensions rising again after North Korea’s 2009 nuclear test and its May 2010 shelling of a South Korean island, South Korea lit the “tree,” which was clearly visible in the North Korean city of Kaesong. The North Korean regime regularly accuses South Korea of trying to spread Christianity among its people, but Uriminzokkiri, a state-run news website, kicked the outrage up a notch, calling the tree lighting “a mean form of psychological warfare.”
In 2011, South Korea was going to light the tree — as well as two more — despite North Korea’s threats, but the lighting was canceled out of respect for the mourning period following Kim Jong Il’s death. This year, the South Koreans decided to go ahead with it — and despite some warnings that Kim Jong Un has decided to strike the tree, the Wall Street Journal reports, “judging from the official state media, North Korea seems not to care very much.”
KIM JAE-MYUNG/AFP/Getty Images
Hugo Chávez is OK with Christmas — in 2011, he used the holiday as an opportunity to spam the entire country’s cell phones with a special Christmas text. He’s just not OK with yanqui imperialist Christmas. In 2006, the Venezuelan president reportedly banned Christmas trees and images of Santa Claus from government offices because he deemed them too American. Instead, Chávez said, his country ought to celebrate the holiday with symbols inspired by Venezuelan tradition, such as mangers or ornaments decorated with the tropical Flor de la Navidad (poinsettia).
Other holidays have felt his wrath as well. In 2005, according to the BBC, Chávez urged Venezuelans not to celebrate Halloween, calling the U.S. custom a “game of terror.” A tradition in which “families go and begin to disguise their children as witches” is “contrary to our way,” he said.
This year, Christmas in Venezuela will be affected yet again — though more due to incompetence than deliberate policy. The Economist reports that the government takeover of Venezuelan ports has created huge holdups in processing imports. Due to a combination of poor maintenance, inexperienced management, and bureaucratic obstruction, a number of “seasonal products” including trees, toys, and popular Christmas foods are piled up in the country’s ports. Some products might not arrive in time for Christmas, the magazine warns.
LEO RAMIREZ/AFP/Getty Images
In austere Saudi Arabia, non-Muslim religious activities are banned in public — no churches, no wearing crosses, no importing Bibles, and no Christmas. Expatriates and travelers in the kingdom have found ways to celebrate the holiday, but are generally advised to keep their jingle bells to themselves.
The country’s hard-line religious police are especially alert in the days leading up to Christmas and other Christian and Western celebrations. According to a 2004 article from the Associated Press, “Christmas cards are sold under the counter and only in very few stores. Some florists discreetly sell Christmas trees, mostly artificial ones, and poinsettias. One florist told customers that several dozen fresh trees from Holland were intercepted at the airport, hacked to pieces and then sent back to Holland.”
In a recent blog post, one American ex-intelligence officer who has lived in Saudi Arabia writes that Christmas celebrations and decorations are tolerated in Western compounds. But outside the compounds, no one should “flaunt the holiday spirit.”
Not everyone in the Saudi government is totally bereft of good tidings. As David Keyes pointed out in the Wall Street Journal last year, the Saudi attitude toward the holiday season makes the 2011 holiday card sent out last year by Saudi Ambassador to the United States Adel al-Jubeir especially unexpected. It read: “Behold, the angels said: ‘O Mary, God giveth thee glad tidings of a Word from Him: his name will be Christ Jesus, the son of Mary, held in honour in this world and hereafter and of (the company of) those nearest to God.'”
FAYEZ NURELDINE/AFP/Getty Images
Cuba is one place where the law fought Christmas, and Christmas won. In 1969, revolutionary leader Fidel Castro decided the country couldn’t afford for Cubans to take the day off during the all-important sugar harvest, so he banned Christmas as a public holiday. The edict lasted for three decades. Yoani Sánchez, FP contributor and award-winning Cuban blogger, remembers growing up during the ban: “Of all the naughty words and phrases I remember from childhood, two stand out as being particularly taboo: ‘Christmas’ and ‘Human Rights.'”
In 1998, thanks largely to pressure from the Vatican, the communist government restored Christmas. Not everyone embraced the change. In December 1998, one Cuban newspaper warned its readers to beware of Santa Claus, whom its editors, anticipating Hugo Chávez’s position years later, called a symbol of American “consumerism,” “cultural hegemony,” and “mental colonization.” Santa, who one newspaper called “The leading symbol of the hagiography of US mercantilism,” bore the brunt of the abuse. (Some of the opposition to American Christmas tradition was more practical: According to one columnist, Christmas trees and artificial snow were inappropriate in a tropical country.)
Today, according to Sánchez, Cuban government institutions mostly remain undecorated during the holiday season, but many in this deeply Catholic country now celebrate Christmas with enthusiasm, decorating their homes and shops with garlands, lights, small plastic trees and images of Santa Claus. “These visual excesses of today are very likely the popular response to all those Christmas eves celebrated in whispers, or totally ignored,” she writes.
If even a totalitarian communist government can’t defeat Christmas, we probably don’t have much to fear from the liberal secular agenda.
ADALBERTO ROQUE/AFP/Getty Images
Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and a senior editor at The National Interest. Prior to Fletcher, he taught at the University of Chicago and the University of Colorado at Boulder. Drezner has received fellowships from the German Marshall Fund of the United States, the Council on Foreign Relations, and Harvard University. He has previously held positions with Civic Education Project, the RAND Corporation, and the Treasury Department.| Daniel W. Drezner |
Josh Rogin covers national security and foreign policy and writes the daily Web column The Cable. His column appears bi-weekly in the print edition of The Washington Post. He can be reached for comments or tips at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Previously, Josh covered defense and foreign policy as a staff writer for Congressional Quarterly, writing extensively on Iraq, Afghanistan, Guantánamo Bay, U.S.-Asia relations, defense budgeting and appropriations, and the defense lobbying and contracting industries. Prior to that, he covered military modernization, cyber warfare, space, and missile defense for Federal Computer Week Magazine. He has also served as Pentagon Staff Reporter for the Asahi Shimbun, Japan's leading daily newspaper, in its Washington, D.C., bureau, where he reported on U.S.-Japan relations, Chinese military modernization, the North Korean nuclear crisis, and more.
A graduate of George Washington University's Elliott School of International Affairs, Josh lived in Yokohama, Japan, and studied at Tokyo's Sophia University. He speaks conversational Japanese and has reported from the region. He has also worked at the House International Relations Committee, the Embassy of Japan, and the Brookings Institution.
Josh's reporting has been featured on CNN, MSNBC, C-Span, CBS, ABC, NPR, WTOP, and several other outlets. He was a 2008-2009 National Press Foundation's Paul Miller Washington Reporting Fellow, 2009 military reporting fellow with the Knight Center for Specialized Journalism and the 2011 recipient of the InterAction Award for Excellence in International Reporting. He hails from Philadelphia and lives in Washington, D.C.| The Cable |