- By Joshua Keating
Joshua Keating is associate editor at Foreign Policy and the editor of the Passport blog. He has worked as a researcher, editorial assistant, and deputy Web editor since joining the FP staff in 2007. In addition to being featured in Foreign Policy, his writing has been published by the Washington Post, Newsweek International, Radio Prague, the Center for Defense Information, and Romania's Adevarul newspaper. He has appeared as a commentator on CNN International, C-Span, ABC News, Al Jazeera, NPR, BBC radio, and others. A native of Brooklyn, New York, he studied comparative politics at Oberlin College.
ForeignPolicy.com is getting a little more .ru traffic today, since the Russian media seems to have picked up on Ian Bremmer’s list of the world’s most powerful people. The Eurasia Group president’s tongue-in-cheek post on the organization’s FP blog, The Call, lists "nobody" as the world’s most powerful person — no surprise to regular Bremmer readers — and Russian President Vladimir Putin at No. 2. But Bremmer’s write-up isn’t exactly complimentary:
In Russia’s personalized system, this is still the person who counts. He isn’t as popular as he used to be, and his country has no Soviet-scale clout or influence, but no one on the planet has consolidated more domestic and regional power than Putin.
But in Russia’s state-controlled media, an FP blogger noting that Russia’s political system has no checks or balances became Foreign Policy magazine bestowing an honor on Putin. Here’s the wire service ITAR-TASS:
Foreign Policy magazine names Putin as most influential politician
LONDON, January 4 (Itar-Tass) — President Vladimir Putin of Russia has been named by the Foreign Policy magazine as the world’s most influential political, business, and public figure.
A regular issue of the magazine, which carries a list of ratings of persons who determine ways for the development of the present-day world, appeared on sale on Friday.
Of course, there are a few things that aren’t right about this. It wasn’t "Foreign Policy," but one FP blogger, it’s not an annual feature, and the item did not appear in the print magazine. Plus, the writer conveniently leaves out Bremmer’s not-so-flattering reason for putting Putin on the list.
Voice of Russia expands on the story, bringing in some expert opinions:
In a prompt commentary, Director of the Moscow-based Socioeconomic and Political Research Institute Professor Dmitry Badovsky has said he believes Russia’s presidency of the G20 in 2013 should help the Russian President retain this enviable position.
Russian analysts believe the American foreign policy now has to take what they call ‘the long-term Putin factor’ into account.
Head of the Politology Department of Moscow’s High Economic School Professor Leonid Polyakov spoke about this in Moscow Friday after the Foreign Policy magazine ranked Russian President Vladimir Putin the most influential world leader of 2012.
Interestingly, Putin occupies Spot Two in the magazine’s table, while Spot One is empty. Professor Polyakov believes this betrays American reluctance to recognize a non-American as the world’s top kick.
Right, we’d never put a non-American at the top of any list.
To their credit, Russian state-sponsored broadcaster RT got the story right, specifying that it was Eurasia Group, not FP, that came up with the list.
Some backlash to the initial coverage has already started. Leonid Storch, blogger from the independent and often critical Echo Moskvy radio station, actually looked at the website, saw the original context of the ranking, and pronounced all the hype around the list "overcooked" and the result of the media’s "inability to verify information and overconfidence in the printed word."
Perhaps, though it’s hardly a problem unique to Russia.