- By John HudsonJohn Hudson is a senior reporter at Foreign Policy, where he covers diplomacy and national security issues in Washington. He has reported from several geopolitical hotspots, including Ukraine, Pakistan, Malaysia, China, and Georgia. Prior to joining FP, John covered politics and global affairs for the Atlantic magazine’s news blog, the Atlantic Wire. In 2008, he covered the August war between Russia and Georgia from Tbilisi and the breakaway region of Abkhazia. He has appeared on CNN, MSNBC, BBC, C-SPAN, Fox News radio, Al Jazeera, and other broadcast outlets. He has been with the magazine since 2013.
It’s never an easy thing to defend a terror suspect, but this is not Philip Weinstein’s first time around the block. Known for his "aggressive" courtroom presence, Weinstein, an attorney at Federal Defenders of New York, entered a not-guilty plea on behalf of his client Sulaiman Abu Ghaith this morning to charges that Abu Ghaith conspired to kill Americans.
Weinstein declined to comment to us and other reporters today, but he’s been in the spotlight before for defending Faisal Shahzad, the so-called "Times Square bomber" who attempted to detonate a car bomb in 2010 before it malfunctioned, and Abduwali Abdukhadir Muse, a Somali man who pled guilty to conspiracy and hostage taking in the hijacking of the Maersk Alabama container ship in April 2009," according to the New York Times.
Weinstein’s newest case, involving al Qaeda’s former spokesman and Osama bin Laden’s son–in-law, has already become politicized as Republican lawmakers criticize the Obama administration for holding the trial in federal court as opposed to a military tribunal, where Abu Ghaith would be afforded fewer rights. However, according to a glowing Times profile of Weinstein in 2010, he appears to be more than prepared to handle the case. The graduate of Cornell and the University of Michigan Law School used to run Legal Aid’s criminal appeal bureau for nearly 10 years and has worked on at least two dozen federal trials.
In 2010, here’s what Times reporter Benjamin Weiser found out about him:
William E. Hellerstein, a professor at Brooklyn Law School who had earlier run the appeals bureau and remains a friend, said Mr. Weinstein’s appellate background gave him an eye for the mistakes lawyers make and how to avoid them. He said Mr. Weinstein was a methodical and precise lawyer who did not make himself the focus of a trial.
"He doesn’t break the furniture," Professor Hellerstein said. "He is a careful, thorough student of the game."
In a narcotics trial in December, Mr. Weinstein represented a client who was convicted, but the jury rejected the government’s position on the amount of drugs involved, allowing for the man to receive a mandatory five-year sentence instead of a mandatory 10-year term.
Perhaps the most interesting aspect about the story is a flattering comment from Preet Bharara, the U.S. attorney for the Southern district of New York, who just so happens to be taking a lead role in the prosecution of Abu Ghaith. Speaking of Weinstein and his colleagues, Bharara calls them "formidable adversaries who always hold us to our proof, as they should." "They have earned their reputation as among the finest public defenders in the country," he adds. Well, looks like he’s got his work cut out for him.