- By Isaac Stone FishIsaac Stone Fish is Asia Editor. A Mandarin speaker, he lived in China for seven years before moving to Washington DC. His articles have also appeared in the New York Times, the Economist, the Washington Post, and the Los Angeles Times, and he has appeared as a commentator on MSNBC, BBC, NPR, Al-Jazeera, and PRI, among others.
What are North Korea’s Asian neighbors saying about the escalating tensions on the Korean peninsula? Here’s a brief look at some of the press coverage in the region that should give you a flavor of how China, Japan, and South Korea are analyzing the standoff. (For China, I considered a combination of Chinese- and English-language news sources; for Japan and South Korea, I was only able to read English-language news.)
Chinese coverage is less critical than coverage in other country about the role Pyongyang and Beijing have played in the tensions, but also surprisingly pessimistic about the possibility for all parties to reach a resolution. An article originally posted earlier this month in Global Times, a tabloid known for its nationalistic views, argues that "the North Korea nuclear situation is almost out of control," and that North Korea is unlikely to give up its nuclear weapons. While the world "obviously won’t turn around and give North Korea nuclear power status," a more realistic goal is to prevent Pyongyang from conducting another nuclear test, the paper reasons.
The Global Times story also cautions that South Korea is increasingly becoming North Korea’s "hostage," and that this won’t change even if Seoul develops nuclear weapons.
South Korean news outlets, for their part, are focused on the country’s readiness to face a North Korean attack. The English-language website of Chosun Ilbo, a major South Korean newspaper, published an editorial on Friday entitled, "The Military Must Pull Itself Together," which relates how a defector in a fishing boat was "astonishingly" able to return to North Korea by crossing "the heavily armed sea border undetected at a time when North Korea threatens nuclear attacks on a daily basis."
A Friday editorial in the Korea Times, an English-language newspaper, emphasized the importance of strengthening the National Intelligence Service, South Korea’s intelligence agency "in the face of mounting threats from North Korea."
Of the three countries, Japan seems least worried about the possibility of an attack — perhaps because North Korea flings most of its invective at South Korea and the United States (though an editorial in the Japan Times, an English-language newspaper, points out that North Korea has threatened to launch nuclear missile attacks on "three areas in Japan hosting U.S. military bases"). On April 2, the day North Korea said it would restart its plutonium reactor in Yongbyon, an analysis in Asahi Shimbun, a major Japanese newspaper, argued that North Korea is the "the one that appears most worried about triggering a war in Northeast Asia." An April 4 editorial in the same paper expressed more concern about the possibility of a nuclear accident — and "radioactive contamination in South Korea" — than about Pyongyang actually using a nuclear weapon.
Especially for China, which hosts thousands of North Koreans and Pyongyang’s largest trading partner, there are plenty of domestic angles to explore as well. On its Sina Weibo account, CCTV News, part of China’s state broadcaster, posted a story about a brand of mineral water from North Korea selling in supermarkets in the Chinese city of Qingdao for $1.60 a bottle. An article about the product posted in Xinhua expresses befuddlement that there is high-end North Korean mineral water ($1.60 is expensive in China) and that it even contains a QR code.
Daniel W. Drezner is professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and a senior editor at The National Interest. Prior to Fletcher, he taught at the University of Chicago and the University of Colorado at Boulder. Drezner has received fellowships from the German Marshall Fund of the United States, the Council on Foreign Relations, and Harvard University. He has previously held positions with Civic Education Project, the RAND Corporation, and the Treasury Department.| Daniel W. Drezner |