The U.S. fight against global terrorism is costly, distracting, self-perpetuating, unceasing, and unresolvable. Is there any way to fix it?
- By David RothkopfDavid Rothkopf is visiting professor at Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs and visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. His latest book is The Great Questions of Tomorrow. He has been a longtime contributor to Foreign Policy and was CEO and editor of the FP Group from 2012 to May 2017.
This week on The E.R., David Rothkopf, Rosa Brooks, Kori Schake, and Tom Ricks talk about the people they would least like to have dinner with and then drill down into the social and political consequences of the war on terror. Did Osama bin Laden achieve one of the greatest tactical victories in modern warfare by setting the United States and its allies on an endless, uphill path toward unobtainable objectives? Has the U.S. reaction, or overreaction, to the threat of global terrorism changed the world’s political and security goals and its burden-sharing dynamic? And finally, the panel considers where and how the fight against the problem of terrorism (and against the secondary problems created by fighting terrorism) went catastrophically wrong.