- By Emily TamkinEmily Tamkin is a staff writer at Foreign Policy. She writes for FP’s The Cable, a real-time take on the news in Washington and the wider world. She has been at FP since the fall of 2016, before which she was an associate editor at New America, a nonpartisan think tank in Washington. She has a B.A. in Russian literature from Columbia University, an M.Phil. in Russian and East European studies from the University of Oxford, and studied Soviet dissidence in archival centers in Moscow, Tbilisi, and, on a Fulbright, in Bremen — all of which means that at FP, she writes when she can on Russia and Central and Eastern Europe., Robbie GramerRobbie Gramer is a staff writer at Foreign Policy. He writes for The Cable, FP’s real-time take on all things, well, foreign policy. Before he joined FP in 2016, he used to think in a tank, managing the NATO portfolio at the Atlantic Council for three years. He’s a graduate of American University’s School of International Service, where he studied international relations and European affairs. He has lived in both Washington and Brussels, though he grew up in Idaho and Oregon, so he’s a West Coaster at heart. When he’s not busy reporting, he’s probably busy starting three new books before he has finished the last one or planning a trip to a national park he hasn’t visited yet.
U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration is mulling plans to circumvent the World Trade Organization. Incoming administration officials asked the U.S. Trade Representative’s office to find ways to bypass WTO rules on dispute resolution to levy unilateral U.S. sanctions against other countries such as China, sources tell the Financial Times.
The United States set up the WTO’s dispute resolution mechanism two decades ago. It has been a cornerstone of the global trade regime ever since, arbitrating trade disputes between member countries.
The specter of bypassing the WTO has experts worried. “There will be horrible negative side effects” if Trump’s team follows through, said Simon Lester, a WTO veteran and trade expert now with the Cato Institute. Prominent economist Paul Krugman said on Twitter the move was “flirting with dismantling the most fundamental rules of trade.”
Under existing WTO rules, member countries aren’t supposed to retaliate against one another with unilateral sanctions or tariffs. Such a move, particularly by the world’s most powerful economy, could trigger a chain reaction of retaliations and dismantle the global rules-based trade system the WTO oversees, experts say. “It could get us into some new and scary world of international economics we haven’t seen before,” Lester told Foreign Policy.
Trump departed with decades of U.S. tradition with his free-trade skepticism and “America First” platform, even calling the World Trade Organization “a disaster” during his presidential campaign.
And just over a month into his presidency, he’s taking steps to back away from trade. During his first week in office, he withdrew the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade agreement with Canada and 10 other Asian and Latin American countries — a move White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon called “one of the most pivotal moments in modern American history.” He’s also stacked his administration with protectionists such as National Trade Council chairman Peter Navarro and U.S. Trade Representative nominee Robert Lighthizer.
The threat of bypassing WTO rules may just be a negotiating tactic, Lester said. Trade experts anticipate the Trump White House to push for reforms to the WTO to give more deference to U.S. government decisions on trade and loosen rules on duties in an effort to protect U.S. industries from competitive imports. “Are they really serious about this threat or is it just designed to create leverage to push WTO reforms through?” Lester asked. “It may be just talk.”
The WTO system already has widespread international support, and the rest of the world is likely to continue to use it regardless of whether the United States withdraws or bypasses it.
Other economic powerhouses have already warned they won’t let themselves be pushed around by Washington, though. Xi Jinping tried to warn the United States off a trade war, as did EU Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmström, who specifically cited the threat of retaliation.
Correction, Feb. 27, 2017, 1:13 p.m.: This piece was updated to clarify the TPP agreement included Canada and Latin American countries. It originally incorrectly stated the agreement was between the United States and 11 other Asian countries.
Photo credit:SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images