With Saudi Blockade Threatening Famine in Yemen, U.S. Points Finger at Iran
White House pushes to release intel blaming Iran for attacks on Saudi Arabia
The White House is pressing to declassify intelligence allegedly linking Iran to short-range ballistic missile attacks by Yemeni insurgents against Saudi Arabia, part of a public relations blitz aimed at persuading America’s U.N. counterparts that Tehran is helping to fuel the country’s conflict.
The effort to cast blame on Iran comes at a time when the U.S.-backed Saudi military coalition in Yemen is facing mounting international condemnation for enforcing a blockade on vital ports that threatens to plunge the country into a massive famine.
The declassification push is part of a broader U.S. bid to isolate Tehran in the U.N. Security Council, and potentially to provide a justification for enforcing sanctions or imposing new penalties against Tehran. It marks a surprising recognition by President Donald Trump — who dismissed the United Nations as a feckless talk shop during his presidential campaign — that the world body is critical for rallying international support.
The U.S. campaign to highlight Tehran’s violation of U.N. sanctions suffered a setback earlier this month,when a U.N. panel of experts disclosed it has received no proof that Iran furnished Yemen’s Shiite Houthi insurgents with the missile it fired on Nov. 4 at an airport near the Saudi capital of Riyadh.
The attack was cited earlier this month by Saudi Arabia as a justification for imposing a blockade on Houthi-controlled ports and the airport in Yemen’s capital, Sanaa, a move condemned by aid agencies as paving the way to a humanitarian catastrophe. Saudi Arabia announced Wednesday that it would reopen the port in Hodeida and the airport in Sanaa to humanitarian aid deliveries. But the move was criticized by the International Rescue Committee as a half measure which will continue to block the import of vital commercial goods and fuel.
Critics said the White House campaign to release more information about suspected Iranian arms deliveries appears calculated to deflect attention from international — and congressional — outrage directed at Riyadh over the blockade.
“They desperately want to change the conversation away from starving children to Iranian bad guys,” said Bruce Riedel, a retired CIA officer who advised four presidents on the Middle East. “But I’m skeptical it’s going to work. Because the imagery of kids that you see on the BBC or 60 Minutes is a lot more powerful than the imagery of a declassified document.”
But Trump administration officials came to Saudi Arabia’s defense, saying Riyadh had cause to be concerned about arms smuggling: “How would countries react if a ballistic missile hit your capital?” said one senior U.S. official, who asked that their name not be used.
In Washington, U.S. national security officials on Monday sought to persuade U.N. diplomats and members of the expert panel that Iran is arming Yemen’s Shiite Houthis. Meanwhile, a U.N. team traveled to Riyadh this week for a briefing and to see missile debris.
The United Nations had demanded Saudi Arabia provide more access to technical information and other evidence from the missile attacks. But the Saudi government, worried about admitting vulnerabilities in its missile defenses and accustomed to secrecy, was initially reluctant to release more information on the attacks, according to U.S. officials.
A senior Trump administration official told Foreign Policy that “disclosing things like this was new for them.”
For years, Iran was prohibited by numerous U.N. Security Council resolutions from developing, testing or transferring ballistic missiles on the grounds that they could be used to advance what the U.S. and other Western powers feared was a clandestine nuclear weapons program.
But under the terms of a landmark 2015 nuclear pact, the missile prohibition was replaced by an appeal to Tehran to voluntarily halt the development of ballistic missiles that can be used to deliver a nuclear payload. Iran, which has long denied it intends to produce nuclear weapons, has taken that as a green light to advance its missile program.
The Trump administration has been struggling for months to identify ways to apply greater diplomatic pressure on Tehran, which is supporting a network of Shiite militias in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, and Yemen, to expand its influence and power in the region. But the administration’s effort to rally international support for its policies on Iran has been stymied by Trump’s threats to abandon the Iran nuclear deal.
A chief goal of U.S. policymakers is to convince U.N. experts to conclude Iran violated the arms embargo in an upcoming report in December to the Security Council by U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres. That, they hope, could pave the way for the United States to secure support from key allies, particularly European powers that are deepening economic ties with Tehran, for a tougher stance with Iran.
U.S. officials say they are convinced that Iran can be linked to the Nov. 4 missile strike, which Saudi Arabia claims it intercepted on approach to the King Khalid International Airport near the Saudi capital of Riyadh. Less than a week after the November airport attack, the U.S. Air Force’s top officer at Central Command, Lt. Gen. Jeffrey L. Harrigian, said the missile bore “Iranian markings.”
Nikki Haley, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said earlier this month that the Houthis also fired an Iranian Qiam 1 short-range missile in a July attack on an oil refinery in Yanbu.
Yemen’s military has retained prewar stockpiles of SCUD-B and Hwasong-6 missiles, some of which have been modified, according to the U.N. report.
The U.N. panel raised the prospect of an Iranian role in Yemen’s missile program, writing that it could not rule out the possibility that Yemen may be receiving technical advice from “foreign missile specialists,” or that its missiles may have been altered to extend their range.
It also cited the discovery of a shipment of industrial equipment, including “corrosion resistant storage tanks virtually identical to those used to support SCUD SRBM [short-range ballistic missile] operations.” The equipment, according to the panel, “almost certainly originated in the Islamic Republic of Iran.”
The Houthis have claimed their attacks on the airport and refinery employed a missile called a Burqan 2H, which is akin to a SCUD C missile. But the range of the typical SCUD C only has roughly a 700-kilometer (435-mile) range and yet the targets hit in the recent attacks were more than 200 kilometers beyond that distance, U.S. officials said.
The senior administration official told Foreign Policy that missile debris recovered after the airport and refinery attacks resembled an Iranian short-range ballistic missile, the Qiam. The official showed unclassified photos to FP that noted the missile debris had the same exhaust ports and other design features that matched the Iranian weapon. Scud missiles have fins, but tail sections of the missiles recovered in Saudi Arabia had no fins — another similarity to the Qiam design.
“It doesn’t physically resemble the SCUD C,” said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
The photos also showed a fan jet recovered from the missile debris bearing the logo of an Iranian defense company, Shahid Bagheri Industries, the official said.
The panel of experts, however, had said in its report earlier this month that supporting evidence shared with them was insufficient to prove Iranian involvement. “The supporting evidence provided in these briefings is far below that required to attribute this attack to a Qiam-1 SRBM,” the panel wrote in their report.
In addition to the recovered debris, the United States has “other” unspecified intelligence to help make the case that the missiles were Iran-made, and plans to share some of that intelligence with the U.N. team, the U.S. official said.
“The Iranians have consistently said there’s no Iranians in Yemen, that these are really just clever Houthis that paid attention in science class,” the official.
The evidence from the recent missile attacks proved otherwise, the official said, and the declassification effort presented “an opportunity to show European allies what the Iranians are doing.”
Apart from the ballistic missile attacks, Trump administration officials say Iran is allegedly behind improvements in Houthi surface-to-surface missiles as well as other weapons, making the projectiles more precise.
Saudi Arabia’s foreign ministry said investigators studying the intercepted missile uncovered evidence proving “the role of Iranian regime in manufacturing them.”
There is “ample proof, going back more than a year, or Iran providing arms to the Houthis,” said one former State Department foreign service officer, who like other U.S. officials speaking on the issue, ask that their name not be used. “There is no credibility to the Houthis’ claim they made the missiles themselves.”
Experts said they welcomed the Trump administration decision to pursue its case for Iranian involvement to the United Nations, saying it would make it easier to secure European support for a tougher line on Iran.
The senior U.S. official said there were other clues suggesting Iran’s hand in the Yemen conflict. A Houthi boat captured off the Yemeni coast by the Emiratis, who are part of the Saudi-led coalition waging war against the Houthi rebels in Yemen, had a computer system that seemed to be manufactured in Iran.
The boat’s control system included circuit boards that had markings for FHM Electronics, an Iranian joint-stock company in Tehran, the official said. The boat’s autopilot software resembled software advertised in the Iranian firm’s catalog, and contained various GPS coordinates including one corresponding with the location of a known Iranian Revolutionary Guard research organization in Tehran.
The diplomatic initiative is playing out against a backdrop of rising criticism in Congress and abroad of the U.S.-backed Saudi coalition. Two days after Nov. 4 strike, the coalition announced it had shut all land, air, and sea ports in Yemen to halt the smuggling of arms into Yemen. But the blockade, which triggered a famine warning from the U.N. early warning system, prevented all food, medicine, fuel, and other goods from entering the Houthi controlled port of Hodeida, and has sparked international condemnation.
“#Yemen risks starving to death,” the International Committee of the Red Cross warned on Twitter Tuesday. “70% of the population is reliant on humanitarian aid — that’s not getting in.”
The United States, United Kingdom, and other Saudi allies have “only weeks to avoid being complicit in a famine of biblical proportions,” Jan Egeland, a senior U.N. advisor on humanitarian issue and the secretary general of the Norwegian Refugee Council, tweeted. “Lift the blockade now.”
Colum Lynch is Foreign Policy’s award-winning U.N.-based senior diplomatic reporter. @columlynch
1Erdogan Is Failing Economics 101 877 Shares
2Putin's Endgame in Syria Has Arrived 642 Shares
4Disinformation Wars 176 Shares
6Sexpat Journalists Are Ruining Asia Coverage 5032 Shares
7Italy Needed a Government. It Got a Circus. 506 Shares
8Trump Has No Idea How Diplomatic Deals Work 1121 Shares
9How to Steal an Election in Broad Daylight 910 Shares
10Regime Change for Dummies 2812 Shares