FP Logo Your portal to global politics, economics, and ideas
FP Logo
Article Index
Search Site
FP Archive article
free registration required
back issue only
Home
Search Site
FP Archive
Article Index
FP e-Alert
Breaking Global News
Worldwide Links
Idea Feed
Country Intelligence
Free FP e-Alert
Submit Free FP e-Alert
More Info
Academic Program
Logo CEIP
Current Article

The article you requested is only available to FP subscribers. A short excerpt is provided here for your reference. Log on or purchase Archive access below to read the full story.

Engineering Jihad
January/February 2008

Osama bin Laden studied engineering. So did lead 9/11 hijacker Mohammed Atta, 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and Ramzi Yousef, the architect of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Exceptions to the rule? Hardly. Most high-profile Islamist terrorists are, in fact, highly educated. And according to new research at Oxford University by sociologists Diego Gambetta and Steffen Hertog, most of them may be engineers.

After compiling educational biographies for nearly 300 known members of violent Islamist groups from 30 countries, Gambetta and Hertog found that the vast majority—69 percent—had attended college. Of those with clear areas of study, nearly half had gone into engineering. Across the Middle East and Southeast Asia, the share of engineers in violent Islamist groups was found to be at least nine times greater than what one might expect, given their proportion of the working male population.

It may be tempting to assume that people with engineering backgrounds are more likely to be recruited for their technical (read: bomb-making) skills. Gambetta and Hertog dismiss this claim. Instead, they argue radicalized engineers are vastly overrepresented in terrorist ranks thanks to thwarted professional ambitions and, most controversially, a unique mind-set ripe for extremism.

These highly trained individuals, who consider themselves problem solvers—social engineers, if you will—tend to be attracted by the “intellectually clean, unambiguous, and all-encompassing” solutions that both the laws of engineering and radical Islam provide, according to Gambetta and Hertog. Their research also cites surveys in Canada, Egypt, and the United States as evidence that engineers tend to be more religious and politically conservative...



Read the Full Story!


Free and unlimited access is available to all active FP subscribers. Non-subscribers can gain instant access by subscribing to FP or by purchasing a 24-hour or 7-day pass.

If you are a current subscriber or an FP passholder, please log in here:

Username:

Password:
Remember my login information on this computer.

If you are a subscriber, but don't have login information, click here to register now.

Forgot your username or password? Enter your e-mail address below and we'll send you your login information.

E-mail:

Subscribe Now

Not a subscriber? SUBSCRIBE NOW for instant access to all FP content! You'll get 6 insightful issues of FP and complete archive access for $19.95!

Passes

Buy this article for $0.00 USD

Buy a 24-hour Pass for just $7.95 USD.

Buy a 7-day Pass for just $24.95 USD.


 

Shop at FP
Subscribe to FP
Login
Username
Password


| Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Contact Us | Site Map | About CEIP | Subscribe |

 
 
FP Logo
1779 Massachusetts Avenue, NW | Washington, DC 20036 | Phone: 202-939-2230 | Fax: 202-483-4430
FOREIGN POLICY is published by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
All contents ©2008 ForeignPolicy.com. All rights reserved.
Site design by bevia.com; Programming by Enovational Design