Early exit plls mean squat, but…
Two years ago I remember being very excited because I got a sneak peak at VNS (Voter News Service) numbers at around 2 PM. Of course, those numbers had Iowa and Pennsylvania going for Bush, so I don’t place a ton of faith in these instruments. That said, compare and contrast Drudge’s info with Joshua ...
Two years ago I remember being very excited because I got a sneak peak at VNS (Voter News Service) numbers at around 2 PM. Of course, those numbers had Iowa and Pennsylvania going for Bush, so I don't place a ton of faith in these instruments. That said, compare and contrast Drudge's info with Joshua Micah Marshall's skinny on early exit polling for crucial Senate elections. Oh, hell, I'll do it for you: ARKANSAS -- Drudge has Pryor (D) winning "easily"; Marshall has Pryor up by 18 points. COLORADO -- A shocker. Drudge also has Strickland (D) winning “easily”; Marshall has him up by 20 points. GEORGIA -- Both Drudge and Marshall have Chambliss (R) up by 4 points. LOUISIANA -- Drudge has Landrieu facing a December runoff. MINNESOTA -- Drudge has Coleman (R) up by 3; Marshall has Mondale up by a similar percentage. MISSOURI -- Drudge has Talent (R) "leading"; Marshall has him up by 10 points. NEW HAMPSHIRE -- Drudge has nothing on this race; Marshall has Shaheen (D) up by 6 points. NORTH CAROLINA -- Very interesting. Drudge has Bowles (D) "leading"; Marshall has Dole up 4-6 points. SOUTH DAKOTA -- Nothing from Drudge; Marshall has Johnson (D) up by 2-4 points. TEXAS -- Drudge has Cornyn (R) up 8 points, and Marshall has him up by 10 points. I predicted Strickland winning, but there's no way in hell that a Democrat is going to win in Colorado by twenty points. This should clue you in to how much these numbers will fluctuate over the day. Of all of the races posted above, the one I find the most interesting is North Carolina, where Drudge and Marshall predict a winner contrary to their own ideological preferences. Developing.... UPDATE: Both Drudge and Marshall now post that the VNS computer has "has somehow broken down or that they themselves aren't trusting their numbers," so that's it as far as exit polls go.
Two years ago I remember being very excited because I got a sneak peak at VNS (Voter News Service) numbers at around 2 PM. Of course, those numbers had Iowa and Pennsylvania going for Bush, so I don’t place a ton of faith in these instruments. That said, compare and contrast Drudge’s info with Joshua Micah Marshall’s skinny on early exit polling for crucial Senate elections. Oh, hell, I’ll do it for you: ARKANSAS — Drudge has Pryor (D) winning “easily”; Marshall has Pryor up by 18 points. COLORADO — A shocker. Drudge also has Strickland (D) winning “easily”; Marshall has him up by 20 points. GEORGIA — Both Drudge and Marshall have Chambliss (R) up by 4 points. LOUISIANA — Drudge has Landrieu facing a December runoff. MINNESOTA — Drudge has Coleman (R) up by 3; Marshall has Mondale up by a similar percentage. MISSOURI — Drudge has Talent (R) “leading”; Marshall has him up by 10 points. NEW HAMPSHIRE — Drudge has nothing on this race; Marshall has Shaheen (D) up by 6 points. NORTH CAROLINA — Very interesting. Drudge has Bowles (D) “leading”; Marshall has Dole up 4-6 points. SOUTH DAKOTA — Nothing from Drudge; Marshall has Johnson (D) up by 2-4 points. TEXAS — Drudge has Cornyn (R) up 8 points, and Marshall has him up by 10 points. I predicted Strickland winning, but there’s no way in hell that a Democrat is going to win in Colorado by twenty points. This should clue you in to how much these numbers will fluctuate over the day. Of all of the races posted above, the one I find the most interesting is North Carolina, where Drudge and Marshall predict a winner contrary to their own ideological preferences. Developing…. UPDATE: Both Drudge and Marshall now post that the VNS computer has “has somehow broken down or that they themselves aren’t trusting their numbers,” so that’s it as far as exit polls go.
Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner
More from Foreign Policy

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.