Early exit plls mean squat, but…

Two years ago I remember being very excited because I got a sneak peak at VNS (Voter News Service) numbers at around 2 PM. Of course, those numbers had Iowa and Pennsylvania going for Bush, so I don’t place a ton of faith in these instruments. That said, compare and contrast Drudge’s info with Joshua ...

By , a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast.

Two years ago I remember being very excited because I got a sneak peak at VNS (Voter News Service) numbers at around 2 PM. Of course, those numbers had Iowa and Pennsylvania going for Bush, so I don't place a ton of faith in these instruments. That said, compare and contrast Drudge's info with Joshua Micah Marshall's skinny on early exit polling for crucial Senate elections. Oh, hell, I'll do it for you: ARKANSAS -- Drudge has Pryor (D) winning "easily"; Marshall has Pryor up by 18 points. COLORADO -- A shocker. Drudge also has Strickland (D) winning “easily”; Marshall has him up by 20 points. GEORGIA -- Both Drudge and Marshall have Chambliss (R) up by 4 points. LOUISIANA -- Drudge has Landrieu facing a December runoff. MINNESOTA -- Drudge has Coleman (R) up by 3; Marshall has Mondale up by a similar percentage. MISSOURI -- Drudge has Talent (R) "leading"; Marshall has him up by 10 points. NEW HAMPSHIRE -- Drudge has nothing on this race; Marshall has Shaheen (D) up by 6 points. NORTH CAROLINA -- Very interesting. Drudge has Bowles (D) "leading"; Marshall has Dole up 4-6 points. SOUTH DAKOTA -- Nothing from Drudge; Marshall has Johnson (D) up by 2-4 points. TEXAS -- Drudge has Cornyn (R) up 8 points, and Marshall has him up by 10 points. I predicted Strickland winning, but there's no way in hell that a Democrat is going to win in Colorado by twenty points. This should clue you in to how much these numbers will fluctuate over the day. Of all of the races posted above, the one I find the most interesting is North Carolina, where Drudge and Marshall predict a winner contrary to their own ideological preferences. Developing.... UPDATE: Both Drudge and Marshall now post that the VNS computer has "has somehow broken down or that they themselves aren't trusting their numbers," so that's it as far as exit polls go.

Two years ago I remember being very excited because I got a sneak peak at VNS (Voter News Service) numbers at around 2 PM. Of course, those numbers had Iowa and Pennsylvania going for Bush, so I don’t place a ton of faith in these instruments. That said, compare and contrast Drudge’s info with Joshua Micah Marshall’s skinny on early exit polling for crucial Senate elections. Oh, hell, I’ll do it for you: ARKANSAS — Drudge has Pryor (D) winning “easily”; Marshall has Pryor up by 18 points. COLORADO — A shocker. Drudge also has Strickland (D) winning “easily”; Marshall has him up by 20 points. GEORGIA — Both Drudge and Marshall have Chambliss (R) up by 4 points. LOUISIANA — Drudge has Landrieu facing a December runoff. MINNESOTA — Drudge has Coleman (R) up by 3; Marshall has Mondale up by a similar percentage. MISSOURI — Drudge has Talent (R) “leading”; Marshall has him up by 10 points. NEW HAMPSHIRE — Drudge has nothing on this race; Marshall has Shaheen (D) up by 6 points. NORTH CAROLINA — Very interesting. Drudge has Bowles (D) “leading”; Marshall has Dole up 4-6 points. SOUTH DAKOTA — Nothing from Drudge; Marshall has Johnson (D) up by 2-4 points. TEXAS — Drudge has Cornyn (R) up 8 points, and Marshall has him up by 10 points. I predicted Strickland winning, but there’s no way in hell that a Democrat is going to win in Colorado by twenty points. This should clue you in to how much these numbers will fluctuate over the day. Of all of the races posted above, the one I find the most interesting is North Carolina, where Drudge and Marshall predict a winner contrary to their own ideological preferences. Developing…. UPDATE: Both Drudge and Marshall now post that the VNS computer has “has somehow broken down or that they themselves aren’t trusting their numbers,” so that’s it as far as exit polls go.

Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner

More from Foreign Policy

Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.
Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America

The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.
Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense

If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.
Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War

Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.
An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests

And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.