I’m not a lawyer, but I know bulls@&t when I see it
The San Francisco Chronicle has a story on one man’s effort to revolutionize international law: “For five years, [human rights lawyer Kirk] Boyd has devoted his life to researching and crafting a document he says will revolutionize the way the world treats its citizens. His may seem like a Sisyphean task, but Boyd — a ...
The San Francisco Chronicle has a story on one man's effort to revolutionize international law:
The San Francisco Chronicle has a story on one man’s effort to revolutionize international law:
“For five years, [human rights lawyer Kirk] Boyd has devoted his life to researching and crafting a document he says will revolutionize the way the world treats its citizens. His may seem like a Sisyphean task, but Boyd — a human rights lawyer who lives in Mill Valley — believes the time is right for an International Bill of Rights that guarantees free speech, freedom of religion, access to free or low-cost health care, shelter, education, fair trials and a host of other ‘absolute’ priorities. When he addresses the United Nations Human Rights Commission Tuesday in Geneva, Boyd will — for the first time — publicly argue for implementation of the International Bill of Rights.”
What to know what your International Bill of Rights looks like? Here’s the document. To Boyd’s credit, it’s not written in legalese. To Boyd’s debit, it’s so contradictory and pie-in-the-sky that I can’t believe he’s devoted five years to it. [What’s specifically wrong with it?–ed. To begin with, a third of the countries in the world could not afford the public goods required of it. The restrictions on representation include this contradictory sentence: “Only individuals, not corporations or other entities, shall be allowed to contribute money or other assets to candidates or ballot measures, but individuals may combine to contribute as a group.” The enforcement mechanism gave me a good chuckle.] I don’t mean to be cruel. It seems clear that Boyd has honorable intentions. But the legal and political foundations of the document and his strategy for implementation (internationalize the European Court for Human Rights) are laughable. I’m sure the Libyan chair of the Human Rights Commission will give Boyd a full hearing. Dan’s Assignment Desk to Eugene Volokh: How did this guy get funding and institutional support from the University of California? UPDATE: Will Baude has some additional thoughts on Boyd’s attempt to draft a freedom of speech clause.
Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner
More from Foreign Policy
Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.
The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.
Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.
How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.