These Democrats get it
Remember that Democrats for National Security web site that I mentioned last week? It’s creator, Timothy Bergreen, has an op-ed in today’s Wall Street Journal with Donna Brazile. The key grafs: Mr. Clinton’s victory in 1992 convinced many Democrats that the Republican advantage on national security was no longer consequential. But the 1992 campaign was ...
Remember that Democrats for National Security web site that I mentioned last week? It's creator, Timothy Bergreen, has an op-ed in today's Wall Street Journal with Donna Brazile. The key grafs:
Remember that Democrats for National Security web site that I mentioned last week? It’s creator, Timothy Bergreen, has an op-ed in today’s Wall Street Journal with Donna Brazile. The key grafs:
Mr. Clinton’s victory in 1992 convinced many Democrats that the Republican advantage on national security was no longer consequential. But the 1992 campaign was an exception–Mr. Clinton’s election took place in the context of post-Cold War euphoria over the “end of history,” with politicians salivating over the prospects of a “peace dividend.” Democrats have yet to fully comprehend the new reality of the post-Sept. 11 world. While most Americans viewed the war in Iraq through the prism of the Twin Towers attacks, many prominent Democrats still seem not to grasp the profound sense of insecurity that so many people feel in our country. This unease is especially pronounced among women, who have been a cornerstone of our party’s strength and without whom we cannot hope to win back the White House or Congress.
What I find particularly interesting here is the transformation of Donna Brazile. In past campaigns, Brazile was a partisan’s partisan, making some extremely inflammatory comments towards Colin Powell and George Bush Sr. Now, she’s on the board of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies and bashing Dukakis in a Wall Street Journal op-ed. Drezner’s Assignment to Beltway bloggers: Explain Brazile’s turnaround — is it a change of heart or a change of tactics? UPDATE: Greg Whyte thinks it’s tactics — Josh Marshall thinks its genuine. Robert Tagorda thinks it’s a combination of the two. He’s got a ton of links on Brazile as well.
Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner
More from Foreign Policy

Can Russia Get Used to Being China’s Little Brother?
The power dynamic between Beijing and Moscow has switched dramatically.

Xi and Putin Have the Most Consequential Undeclared Alliance in the World
It’s become more important than Washington’s official alliances today.

It’s a New Great Game. Again.
Across Central Asia, Russia’s brand is tainted by Ukraine, China’s got challenges, and Washington senses another opening.

Iraqi Kurdistan’s House of Cards Is Collapsing
The region once seemed a bright spot in the disorder unleashed by U.S. regime change. Today, things look bleak.