“Fibber, dumb-ass, or panderer?”
That’s Andrew Sullivan’s question about Richard Gephardt. According to multiple news sources — all courtesy of Eugene Volokh — Gephardt said the following at a candidate forum sponsored by Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow/PUSH Coalition in Michigan yesterday: When I’m president, we’ll do executive orders to overcome any wrong thing the Supreme Court does tomorrow or any ...
That's Andrew Sullivan's question about Richard Gephardt. According to multiple news sources -- all courtesy of Eugene Volokh -- Gephardt said the following at a candidate forum sponsored by Jesse Jackson's Rainbow/PUSH Coalition in Michigan yesterday:
That’s Andrew Sullivan’s question about Richard Gephardt. According to multiple news sources — all courtesy of Eugene Volokh — Gephardt said the following at a candidate forum sponsored by Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow/PUSH Coalition in Michigan yesterday:
When I’m president, we’ll do executive orders to overcome any wrong thing the Supreme Court does tomorrow or any other day.
Dennis Kucinich made a similar statement. Here’s Volokh’s assessment
Do we really want a President who thinks that the President has the power to overcome “any wrong thing the Supreme Court does” using an Executive order? I know lots of people think various actions of the Bush Administration are unconstitutional; I too disagree with some of the Administration’s positions, for instance on the alleged power to detain all unlawful combatants (including U.S. citizens captured on U.S. soil) with no judicial review. I hope the Supreme Court agrees, and decides against the Administration. But I’m pretty confident that if the Supreme Court does so decide, this Administration will comply with the Supreme Court’s order. Gephardt and Kucinich are promising that they’ll flout those orders. Seems to me that they should be taken to task for this, and severely.
Indeed. However, I’m even more alarmed by Gephardt’s casual assumption that he knows more about constitutional law than the Supreme Court. Shudder. By the way, I’d have to go with “panderer.”
Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner
More from Foreign Policy

Can Russia Get Used to Being China’s Little Brother?
The power dynamic between Beijing and Moscow has switched dramatically.

Xi and Putin Have the Most Consequential Undeclared Alliance in the World
It’s become more important than Washington’s official alliances today.

It’s a New Great Game. Again.
Across Central Asia, Russia’s brand is tainted by Ukraine, China’s got challenges, and Washington senses another opening.

Iraqi Kurdistan’s House of Cards Is Collapsing
The region once seemed a bright spot in the disorder unleashed by U.S. regime change. Today, things look bleak.