Well, just one post

I was going to write a quick post to say that Budapest is awesome, but then I read a Washington Post story stating that U.S. forces have put a stop to all local elections in Iraq, and that set me off. The key grafs:

U.S. military commanders have ordered a halt to local elections and self-rule in provincial cities and towns across Iraq, choosing instead to install their own handpicked mayors and administrators, many of whom are former Iraqi military leaders. The decision to deny Iraqis a direct role in selecting municipal governments is creating anger and resentment among aspiring leaders and ordinary citizens, who say the U.S.-led occupation forces are not making good on their promise to bring greater freedom and democracy to a country dominated for three decades by Saddam Hussein. The go-slow approach to representative government in at least a dozen provincial cities is especially frustrating to younger, middle-class professionals who say they want to help their communities emerge from postwar chaos and to let, as one put it, “Iraqis make decisions for Iraq.” “They give us a general,” said Bahith Sattar, a biology teacher and tribal leader in Samarra who was a candidate for mayor until that election was canceled last week. “What does that tell you, eh? First of all, an Iraqi general? They lost the last three wars! They’re not even good generals. And they know nothing about running a city.” The most recent order to stop planning for elections was made by Maj. Gen. Ray Odierno, commander of the 4th Infantry Division, which controls the northern half of Iraq. It follows similar decisions by the 3rd Infantry Division in central Iraq and those of British commanders in the south. In the capital, Baghdad, U.S. officials never scheduled elections for a city government, but have said they are forming neighborhood councils that at some point will play a role in the selection of a municipal government. L. Paul Bremer, the civil administrator of Iraq, said in an interview that there is “no blanket prohibition” against self-rule. “I’m not opposed to it, but I want to do it a way that takes care of our concerns. . . . Elections that are held too early can be destructive. It’s got to be done very carefully.”

If you read further, it’s clear that what scares Bremer and others is the prospect of radical parties — which are now better organized — taking power. I can see this, except it’s also true that radical parties tend to act more like moderates once they face the prospect of governing rather than campaigning. By halting the electoral process — and rewarding ex-generals — the current policy seems to do little more than successfully alienating the people you most want to motivate in Iraq.