The good news and bad news about Palestinian political science
The good news is that — in contrast to many of its neighbors — there exist Palestinian political scientists independent of the state and contributing to the stock of useful knowledge about the region. For an example, click here. The bad news is, good political science is vulnerable to the rule of the mob, as ...
The good news is that -- in contrast to many of its neighbors -- there exist Palestinian political scientists independent of the state and contributing to the stock of useful knowledge about the region. For an example, click here. The bad news is, good political science is vulnerable to the rule of the mob, as this New York Times story makes clear:
The good news is that — in contrast to many of its neighbors — there exist Palestinian political scientists independent of the state and contributing to the stock of useful knowledge about the region. For an example, click here. The bad news is, good political science is vulnerable to the rule of the mob, as this New York Times story makes clear:
A mob attacked an eminent Palestinian political scientist today as he prepared to announce a striking finding from a regionwide survey of Palestinian refugees: Only a small minority of them exercise a “right of return” to Israel as part of a peace agreement. The political scientist, Dr. Khalil Shikaki, the director of the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research here, had intended today to discuss for the Arabic-language press the tensions and complexities of Palestinian society. Instead, struck, shoved and pelted with eggs but not seriously injured, he wound up starkly illustrating them…. The rioters marched from Dr. Shikaki’s office to Mr. Arafat’s compound a few blocks away, where he received them, Palestinians here said. It was not clear if Mr. Arafat knew what they had done. (emphasis added)
Click here for the Voice of America report, which makes it clear that the idiotarians who ransacked the center don’t seem to realize that the poll results suggest that the right of return issue is tractable rather than intractable. Well, so long as this kind of behavior is not condoned by the public authorities, then — oh, wait.
Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School at Tufts University and the author of The Ideas Industry. Twitter: @dandrezner
More from Foreign Policy
A New Multilateralism
How the United States can rejuvenate the global institutions it created.
America Prepares for a Pacific War With China It Doesn’t Want
Embedded with U.S. forces in the Pacific, I saw the dilemmas of deterrence firsthand.
The Endless Frustration of Chinese Diplomacy
Beijing’s representatives are always scared they could be the next to vanish.
The End of America’s Middle East
The region’s four major countries have all forfeited Washington’s trust.
Sign up for World Brief
FP’s flagship evening newsletter guiding you through the most important world stories of the day. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.