(Over)heard and seen at American Political Science Association’s annual meeting
Below are some of the snippets of conversation that caught my ear over the past four days. Note that all of them are not necessarily verbatim what I heard, but rather the best approximation of what I remember when I wrote them down. Looking at the Brad DeLong post that inspired what follows, I’ve come ...
Below are some of the snippets of conversation that caught my ear over the past four days. Note that all of them are not necessarily verbatim what I heard, but rather the best approximation of what I remember when I wrote them down. Looking at the Brad DeLong post that inspired what follows, I've come to the sad conclusion that either economists are wittier than political scientists or that most of the interesting conversations took place out of earshot. Such is life: From a panel discussant: "I was playing golf yesterday, and only psychologically left the golf course five minutes after this panel started. And let me just add how happy I am that APSA moved its starting time for the early morning panel from 8:45 AM to 8:00 AM." "The profession has a lot of neomoralistic moralizing." "My family is just thrilled that APSA is during Labor Day weekend." From a paper presenter: "There's nothing worse you can be than a conspiracy theorist, even though there are so many conspiracies out there." The presenter then went on to imply that the myraid assassinations of prominent liberal figures during the 1960's was part of an organized campaign from the right. "Oh, yeah, mlb.com is a great procrastinator when you're a graduate student." "The papers were all competent, and yet -- somehow -- evil." "I need to finish quickly, since the governor signs all University of California diplomas, and I want to avoid a Schwarzenegger signature on my diploma." "I'm back to writing something real. I was sick of working on ir-real stuff for the past few years." "There's a rumor circulating that the perestroika crowd is distributing a 'most-wanted' deck of playing cards with the top rational choice scholars on them." "99% of APSA's membership could write Paul Krugman's column: 'I loathe Bush.'; 'Bush is stupid.'; Yada, yada, yada." "I fear that in this business we don't reward people who build data sets -- such as me." I can't believe I missed Pedro Martinez vs. Andy Pettite for this panel." "W. has been very good for business." "I'm finishing this project on a combination of cognitive psychology, linguistics, cybernetics, and international relations theory.... it's weird, but good."
Below are some of the snippets of conversation that caught my ear over the past four days. Note that all of them are not necessarily verbatim what I heard, but rather the best approximation of what I remember when I wrote them down. Looking at the Brad DeLong post that inspired what follows, I’ve come to the sad conclusion that either economists are wittier than political scientists or that most of the interesting conversations took place out of earshot. Such is life:
Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner
More from Foreign Policy

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.