The transatlantic trend of full disclosure

I was all geared up to post something about President Bush’s statement that the U.S. had no evidence Saddam Hussein was linked to 9/11. Bush’s statement — and others by Don Rumsfeld and Condi Rice — was made to rebut Vice President Cheney’s Meet the Press comments hinting at such a link. Then David Adesnik ...

By , a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast.

I was all geared up to post something about President Bush's statement that the U.S. had no evidence Saddam Hussein was linked to 9/11. Bush's statement -- and others by Don Rumsfeld and Condi Rice -- was made to rebut Vice President Cheney's Meet the Press comments hinting at such a link. Then David Adesnik beats me to the point:

I was all geared up to post something about President Bush’s statement that the U.S. had no evidence Saddam Hussein was linked to 9/11. Bush’s statement — and others by Don Rumsfeld and Condi Rice — was made to rebut Vice President Cheney’s Meet the Press comments hinting at such a link. Then David Adesnik beats me to the point:

I have to admit, it’s surprising to see Bush discipline Cheney in this sort of way. It means either that Cheney recognized he was wrong and wanted Bush to clarify the matter, or Bush recognized the threat to his credibility that Cheney’s remarks presented. I suspect it was the latter. Which is good, because you want to see the President fully in control of his own Cabinet and his own Administration (emphasis added).

Advantage: Adesnik!! This reinforces a point I made earlier this month about the need for more active White House management of the policy process. Also, kudos to Josh Marshall for effectively fisking Cheney on this point a few hours after his TV appearance. And, while we’re on the subject of full disclosure, it seems Andrew Gilligan and his bosses at the BBC have finally apologized — albeit under cross-examination — for Gilligan’s shabby journalism. Kudos to Andrew Sullivan for staying the course on this issue.

Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner

More from Foreign Policy

Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.
Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America

The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.
Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense

If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.
Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War

Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.
An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests

And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.