Open debate thread
Feel free to debate the debate here — click here for the full transcript. Useful blogging on the subject from Kevin Drum and Robert Tagorda. I was watching intermittently while giving Sam a bath, so I can’t claim my focus was 100%. With that caveat, my impressions: 1) I agree with James Joyner — the ...
Feel free to debate the debate here -- click here for the full transcript. Useful blogging on the subject from Kevin Drum and Robert Tagorda. I was watching intermittently while giving Sam a bath, so I can't claim my focus was 100%. With that caveat, my impressions: 1) I agree with James Joyner -- the best line of the night came from Al Sharpton:
Feel free to debate the debate here — click here for the full transcript. Useful blogging on the subject from Kevin Drum and Robert Tagorda. I was watching intermittently while giving Sam a bath, so I can’t claim my focus was 100%. With that caveat, my impressions: 1) I agree with James Joyner — the best line of the night came from Al Sharpton:
I wanted to say to Governor Dean, don’t be hard on yourself about hooting and hollering. If I had spent the money you did and got 18 percent, I’d still be in Iowa hooting and hollering.
2) Wesley Clark’s response on Michael Moore seemed particularly lame:
I think Michael Moore has the right to say whatever he feels about this. I don’t know whether this is supported by the facts or not. I’ve never looked at it. I’ve seen this charge bandied about a lot. But to me it wasn’t material.
Clark is correct about Moore being able to say what he wants. However, for Clark not to have a comment on Moore’s comment seems like a complete cop-out. [Mark Kleiman disagrees, but I’m not sure if his two posts on this can be reconciled. Last week he admitted that Clark’s non-response to Moore’s accusation concerned him:
Moore was simply wrong to use the word “deserter.” Clark, who surely knows that better than I do, should have corrected Moore’s very bad mistake when asked about it. Having failed to do so, he should do so now.
Post-debate, he backtracks on Clark’s response:
As to Clark, his answer tonight seemed to me quite sensible: Moore is at liberty to say what he likes, and Clark doesn’t have to agree with him or disagree with him.]
3) More generally, I found Clark pretty weak and defensive — I suspect his support is going to start dropping. The big question about New Hampshire should be, where are Dean and Clark supporters going to go? Are they all going to go to Kerry, or do they propel Edwards as well? 4) John Edwards’ articulation of his “no” vote on the $89 billion appropriation for Iraq was coherent and compelling. His response to the Islam question was a bit wobbly. His response to the Defense of Marriage Act question was sound on substance but really wobbly on process — by which I mean that he got his facts wrong. 4) John Kerry looked like he had lost ten pounds since his Iowa victory. Go and discuss!! UPDATE: Matthew Stinson has a great description of Dennis Kucinich’s performance:
Kucinich and his charts. What’s there to say about that? Those scientists who decided to gene-splice Ross Perot and Noam Chomsky must be really proud of themselves right now.
Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner
More from Foreign Policy

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.