Up for grabs
A week ago, Roger L. Simon wrote the following: For me one of the hallmarks of a good weblog is the honesty of the blogger–or at least the decent attempt at honesty because no one can be honest all the time, as Molière has shown us. So in keeping with that limited principal, I am ...
A week ago, Roger L. Simon wrote the following:
A week ago, Roger L. Simon wrote the following:
For me one of the hallmarks of a good weblog is the honesty of the blogger–or at least the decent attempt at honesty because no one can be honest all the time, as Molière has shown us. So in keeping with that limited principal, I am going to open my ballot on here, revealing my votes in the Presidential election and primary and how they change (if they do). I call upon all bloggers–Democratic, Republican and ‘Metropolitical’–to do the same to the extent they can (although the ‘Metros’ should be most interesting because they are the true ‘swing’ voters).
Well, one way to find out who I’m going to support is this Presidential Match site. According to their survey, my top three candidates were Bush, Lieberman… and Al Sharpton!! So I’m not placing a whole lot of faith in that site. Here’s my position — I’m genuinely unsure of who I’m going to vote for. More and more, Bush reminds me of Nixon. He’s not afraid to make the bold move in foreign policy. On domestic policy, Bush seems like he’ll say or do anything, so long as it advances his short-term political advantage. If Karl Rove thought imposing wage and price controls would win Pennsylvania and Michigan for Bush, you’d see an Executive Order within 24 hours. Andrew Sullivan and others have delivered this harangue, so I won’t repeat it. If — a big if — the Democrats put forward a credible alternative, then I could very well pull the donkey lever.
Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner
More from Foreign Policy

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.