The UN weighs in on Darfur
Alexander Higgins of the Associated Press reports that the United Nations is not happy with Sudan’s government: A top U.N. human rights investigator Friday released a scathing report that blames the Sudanese government for atrocities against its civilians in the Darfur region and says “millions of civilians” could die. “It is beyond doubt that the ...
Alexander Higgins of the Associated Press reports that the United Nations is not happy with Sudan's government:
Alexander Higgins of the Associated Press reports that the United Nations is not happy with Sudan’s government:
A top U.N. human rights investigator Friday released a scathing report that blames the Sudanese government for atrocities against its civilians in the Darfur region and says “millions of civilians” could die. “It is beyond doubt that the Government of the Sudan is responsible for extrajudicial and summary executions of large numbers of people over the last several months in the Darfur region, as well as in the Shilook Kingdom in Upper Nile State,” said Asma Jahangir, the U.N. investigator on executions, in a report based on a 13-day visit to the region in June. “The current humanitarian disaster unfolding in Darfur, for which the government is largely responsible, has put millions of civilians at risk, and it is very likely that many will die in the months to come as a result of starvation and disease,” said Jahangir, a Pakistani lawyer. Jahangir said there was “overwhelming evidence” that the killing was carried out “in a coordinated manner by the armed forces of the government and government-backed militias. They appear to be carried out in a systematic manner.” ….The U.S. Congress has labeled the atrocities genocide. The United Nations has described the conflict in Darfur, which began with a rebellion early last year, as the world’s worst humanitarian crisis. Last week the U.N. Security Council passed a resolution giving Sudan 30 days to curb the pro-government Arab militias blamed for the violence in Darfur or face diplomatic and economic penalties.
Here’s a link to the UN News account — I looked for the actual report, but the UN website was not forthcoming. In TNR Online, David Englin discusses the resources that would be needed should a military intervention be necessary.
Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner
More from Foreign Policy

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.