Back on the chain gang

This long national nightmare is finally over. Thank you, Daniel Drezner. You truly are a scholar and a gentleman. Reading this blog has provided me with endless insights. Drezner’s shoes are large, and indeed cavernous; rather than fill them, I’ve been spelunking in them, hoping to find a rich vein of iron ore or, better ...

This long national nightmare is finally over. Thank you, Daniel Drezner. You truly are a scholar and a gentleman. Reading this blog has provided me with endless insights. Drezner’s shoes are large, and indeed cavernous; rather than fill them, I’ve been spelunking in them, hoping to find a rich vein of iron ore or, better yet, some precious metal. No luck thus far: just a plush leather interior, which is exactly as one would expect, this being a shoe. Or shoes. I’ve left the left shoe to Siddharth, and he seems to have done a far better job of filling it with secure nuclear stockpiles, purchased from unscrupulous ex-Soviets. Which leads me to my next point: Thanks also go to Siddharth Mohandas, a prince among men. As most of you know, the South Asian subcontinent has been wracked by Hindu-Muslim tensions; and yet, miraculously, the two of us have managed to get along splendidly, with nary a harsh word exchanged along petty, atavistic communal lines. Dare I say that our alliance stands as an example to the world of the peaceful management of ethnoreligious enmities, and of robust politico-military strength, like NATO. The coalition would be wise to hand over its remaining responsibilities in strife-torn Iraq to this formidable team; yes, we would surely fatten ourselves at the trough of reconstruction spending, directing some considerable sum to the construction of lavish, pharoanic palaces and massive mosaics and tableaux assembled from stray tchotchkes, but we would also bring a lasting peace and the rudiments of civil society and liberal democracy to a country that badly needs all of these things. We would do it through sheer force of will, and also my mutant ability to manipulate and control marmosets, pandas, koalas, and other “lovable” mammals. (As to whether said mammals will be as “lovable” once I’ve molded them into a ferocious, lightning-quick anti-insurgent strike force, I say, “maybe.”) There are a couple of books I’m very excited about. One is by two of the greatest minds working in economics, and thus two of the greatest minds working, as economists have pretty much cornered the market on UBE (i.e., “ultimate brainpower excellence”), Edward Glaeser and Alberto Alesina. It is called Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference.” As the title suggests, the book describes the ways in which Europe and the US have sought to provide assistance to the very poor. This book is an exceptionally useful guide to policymakers, but also sophisticated readers with an interest in not being terrible, selfish, demented, and, let’s be explicit, singularly loathsome human beings. (Hey, I’m not saying you have to buy it, but …) The Alesina-Glaeser book is not to be confused with Streetfighting Against Poor People in the US and Europe: A World of Pain, my forthcoming book, co-authored by Siddharth. That book will be a picaresque journey through the slums of two continents. It will be less informative, but hopefully less expensive as well. Having suffered over a thousand beatings in the course of gathering the research (Siddharth “observed” the beatings from a distance while drinking chai), I certainly hope you’ll find it in your heart to buy it. My heart, by now, has been stabbed with so many sharpened kebab skewers in the mean streets of Brussels that I think I’m about to faint from massive blood loss. (I’ll have you know that I wasn’t assaulted by Muslim immigrant youth, but rather elderly churchgoing Flemish ladies; it just so happens that they had kebab skewers handy, thus strengthening the case for a Europe-wide skewer registry, complete with fingerprinting and a biometric identification kit.) So, I’m moseying for the exit. Provided I can fool Siddharth into joining me, I will start blogging again at Evil Forces, along with a Wu-Tang-esque assemblage of lyrically gifted (and pseudonymous) minor media types. Expect even less in the way of narrative coherence. P.S.- A note on public health: A few of my friends and I loved the Fat Joe album “Don Cartagena” so much that we went ahead and nicknamed ourselves after the various members of the plump one’s “crew.” Thanks to my then-bald pate (shaved, thank you), I had the privilege and the honor of taking on the Fat Joe role myself, despite being relatively slender at the time. Since then, Fat Joe has ascended to ever-greater heights of hip-pop stardom. Right now, the club “banger” “Lean Back” is taking the nation by storm. It is, I dare say, the biggest thing since J-Kwon’s “Tipsy.” The problem is, it’s advising men to “lean back” and roll up their pant legs in lieu of dancing frenetically (to wit, “my [associates] don’t dance, we just pull up our pants, and do the Roca-way, now lean back, lean back, lean back”). Because Fat Joe is, as the name suggests, an ample fellow—he has yet to approach Big Pun levels of girth, but he’s considerably larger than he had been when Pun was still holding it down (“it” being colorful and kaleidoscopic lyrical flows, not his mammoth proportions)—this seems ill-advised, to say the least. One would think he’d be advising his [fellas] to engage in as much vigorous exercise as possible, executing complex and demanding dance steps included. P.P.S.- A note on outsourcing: See? You have nothing to worry about, people. Your jobs are safe. P.P.P.S.- I asked my father a while ago about his experience in settling permanently in the US. Specifically, I was curious as to whether or not he found it difficult to adjust. He had studied here, but returned home in the hopes of helping to develop his native country. Political turmoil and various other considerations led him and my mother to head out in the hopes of getting a fresh start. Anyway, his answer surprised me: he said that he didn’t have a difficult time adjusting at all, as he had an “American” personality all along, which, on reflection, I found very convincing. My father does have an “American” personality in that, like the best Americans I know, he’s very gregarious, open-hearted, distrustful of authority, uncomfortable with rigid hierarchies in general, fairly footloose, always looking for elbow room, inquisitive, generous, and, in the important ways, exceptionally brave. I don’t mean to suggest that these are exclusively American traits—just that this is what I think of when I think of what I like best about the country I grew up in. It occurs to me that there are plenty of people like this in parts of the world that, to put it crudely, hate us, and we should do what we can to win them back to our side. (Not invite them all to move here, of course; the goal is to make the rest of the world as free, and eventually as livable, as our own. The brain drain, whether we like it or not, works against this laudable goal, certainly over the long term.) My guess is that people like this vastly outnumber the bad guys. So at the risk of sounding like a boob, I risk I gleefully take whenever I flap my gums, I think we’re going win this generational struggle to determine the future shape of the world. Know’m sayin’? P.P.P.P.S.- “We’re back on the chain gang / Ooh, back on the chain gang …”

This long national nightmare is finally over. Thank you, Daniel Drezner. You truly are a scholar and a gentleman. Reading this blog has provided me with endless insights. Drezner’s shoes are large, and indeed cavernous; rather than fill them, I’ve been spelunking in them, hoping to find a rich vein of iron ore or, better yet, some precious metal. No luck thus far: just a plush leather interior, which is exactly as one would expect, this being a shoe. Or shoes. I’ve left the left shoe to Siddharth, and he seems to have done a far better job of filling it with secure nuclear stockpiles, purchased from unscrupulous ex-Soviets. Which leads me to my next point: Thanks also go to Siddharth Mohandas, a prince among men. As most of you know, the South Asian subcontinent has been wracked by Hindu-Muslim tensions; and yet, miraculously, the two of us have managed to get along splendidly, with nary a harsh word exchanged along petty, atavistic communal lines. Dare I say that our alliance stands as an example to the world of the peaceful management of ethnoreligious enmities, and of robust politico-military strength, like NATO. The coalition would be wise to hand over its remaining responsibilities in strife-torn Iraq to this formidable team; yes, we would surely fatten ourselves at the trough of reconstruction spending, directing some considerable sum to the construction of lavish, pharoanic palaces and massive mosaics and tableaux assembled from stray tchotchkes, but we would also bring a lasting peace and the rudiments of civil society and liberal democracy to a country that badly needs all of these things. We would do it through sheer force of will, and also my mutant ability to manipulate and control marmosets, pandas, koalas, and other “lovable” mammals. (As to whether said mammals will be as “lovable” once I’ve molded them into a ferocious, lightning-quick anti-insurgent strike force, I say, “maybe.”) There are a couple of books I’m very excited about. One is by two of the greatest minds working in economics, and thus two of the greatest minds working, as economists have pretty much cornered the market on UBE (i.e., “ultimate brainpower excellence”), Edward Glaeser and Alberto Alesina. It is called Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference.” As the title suggests, the book describes the ways in which Europe and the US have sought to provide assistance to the very poor. This book is an exceptionally useful guide to policymakers, but also sophisticated readers with an interest in not being terrible, selfish, demented, and, let’s be explicit, singularly loathsome human beings. (Hey, I’m not saying you have to buy it, but …) The Alesina-Glaeser book is not to be confused with Streetfighting Against Poor People in the US and Europe: A World of Pain, my forthcoming book, co-authored by Siddharth. That book will be a picaresque journey through the slums of two continents. It will be less informative, but hopefully less expensive as well. Having suffered over a thousand beatings in the course of gathering the research (Siddharth “observed” the beatings from a distance while drinking chai), I certainly hope you’ll find it in your heart to buy it. My heart, by now, has been stabbed with so many sharpened kebab skewers in the mean streets of Brussels that I think I’m about to faint from massive blood loss. (I’ll have you know that I wasn’t assaulted by Muslim immigrant youth, but rather elderly churchgoing Flemish ladies; it just so happens that they had kebab skewers handy, thus strengthening the case for a Europe-wide skewer registry, complete with fingerprinting and a biometric identification kit.) So, I’m moseying for the exit. Provided I can fool Siddharth into joining me, I will start blogging again at Evil Forces, along with a Wu-Tang-esque assemblage of lyrically gifted (and pseudonymous) minor media types. Expect even less in the way of narrative coherence. P.S.- A note on public health: A few of my friends and I loved the Fat Joe album “Don Cartagena” so much that we went ahead and nicknamed ourselves after the various members of the plump one’s “crew.” Thanks to my then-bald pate (shaved, thank you), I had the privilege and the honor of taking on the Fat Joe role myself, despite being relatively slender at the time. Since then, Fat Joe has ascended to ever-greater heights of hip-pop stardom. Right now, the club “banger” “Lean Back” is taking the nation by storm. It is, I dare say, the biggest thing since J-Kwon’s “Tipsy.” The problem is, it’s advising men to “lean back” and roll up their pant legs in lieu of dancing frenetically (to wit, “my [associates] don’t dance, we just pull up our pants, and do the Roca-way, now lean back, lean back, lean back”). Because Fat Joe is, as the name suggests, an ample fellow—he has yet to approach Big Pun levels of girth, but he’s considerably larger than he had been when Pun was still holding it down (“it” being colorful and kaleidoscopic lyrical flows, not his mammoth proportions)—this seems ill-advised, to say the least. One would think he’d be advising his [fellas] to engage in as much vigorous exercise as possible, executing complex and demanding dance steps included. P.P.S.- A note on outsourcing: See? You have nothing to worry about, people. Your jobs are safe. P.P.P.S.- I asked my father a while ago about his experience in settling permanently in the US. Specifically, I was curious as to whether or not he found it difficult to adjust. He had studied here, but returned home in the hopes of helping to develop his native country. Political turmoil and various other considerations led him and my mother to head out in the hopes of getting a fresh start. Anyway, his answer surprised me: he said that he didn’t have a difficult time adjusting at all, as he had an “American” personality all along, which, on reflection, I found very convincing. My father does have an “American” personality in that, like the best Americans I know, he’s very gregarious, open-hearted, distrustful of authority, uncomfortable with rigid hierarchies in general, fairly footloose, always looking for elbow room, inquisitive, generous, and, in the important ways, exceptionally brave. I don’t mean to suggest that these are exclusively American traits—just that this is what I think of when I think of what I like best about the country I grew up in. It occurs to me that there are plenty of people like this in parts of the world that, to put it crudely, hate us, and we should do what we can to win them back to our side. (Not invite them all to move here, of course; the goal is to make the rest of the world as free, and eventually as livable, as our own. The brain drain, whether we like it or not, works against this laudable goal, certainly over the long term.) My guess is that people like this vastly outnumber the bad guys. So at the risk of sounding like a boob, I risk I gleefully take whenever I flap my gums, I think we’re going win this generational struggle to determine the future shape of the world. Know’m sayin’? P.P.P.P.S.- “We’re back on the chain gang / Ooh, back on the chain gang …”

This list was compiled by Brian Fung, an editorial researcher at FP.

More from Foreign Policy

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping give a toast during a reception following their talks at the Kremlin in Moscow on March 21.
Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping give a toast during a reception following their talks at the Kremlin in Moscow on March 21.

Can Russia Get Used to Being China’s Little Brother?

The power dynamic between Beijing and Moscow has switched dramatically.

Xi and Putin shake hands while carrying red folders.
Xi and Putin shake hands while carrying red folders.

Xi and Putin Have the Most Consequential Undeclared Alliance in the World

It’s become more important than Washington’s official alliances today.

Russian President Vladimir Putin greets Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev.
Russian President Vladimir Putin greets Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev.

It’s a New Great Game. Again.

Across Central Asia, Russia’s brand is tainted by Ukraine, China’s got challenges, and Washington senses another opening.

Kurdish military officers take part in a graduation ceremony in Erbil, the capital of Iraq’s Kurdistan Region, on Jan. 15.
Kurdish military officers take part in a graduation ceremony in Erbil, the capital of Iraq’s Kurdistan Region, on Jan. 15.

Iraqi Kurdistan’s House of Cards Is Collapsing

The region once seemed a bright spot in the disorder unleashed by U.S. regime change. Today, things look bleak.