Now the President gets intellectually curious
Three weeks ago, the New Republic‘s Ben Adler asked a group of prominent conservatives what they thought about the “intelligent design” theory of the Earth’s creation. Apparently, Adler could have asked President Bush as well, because it turns out he has some thoughts on the matter: President Bush said Monday he believes schools should discuss ...
Three weeks ago, the New Republic's Ben Adler asked a group of prominent conservatives what they thought about the "intelligent design" theory of the Earth's creation. Apparently, Adler could have asked President Bush as well, because it turns out he has some thoughts on the matter:
Three weeks ago, the New Republic‘s Ben Adler asked a group of prominent conservatives what they thought about the “intelligent design” theory of the Earth’s creation. Apparently, Adler could have asked President Bush as well, because it turns out he has some thoughts on the matter:
President Bush said Monday he believes schools should discuss “intelligent design” alongside evolution when teaching students about the creation of life. During a round-table interview with reporters from five Texas newspapers, Bush declined to go into detail on his personal views of the origin of life. But he said students should learn about both theories, Knight Ridder Newspapers reported. “I think that part of education is to expose people to different schools of thought,” Bush said. “You’re asking me whether or not people ought to be exposed to different ideas, the answer is yes.”
Glenn Reynolds lists some other “schools of thought” that might be worth teaching our nation’s children. Readers are encouraged to come up with other “schools of thought” that might challenge evolution. I’ll just close with Charles Krauthammer’s response in Adler’s essay:
The idea that [intelligent design] should be taught as a competing theory to evolution is ridiculous. … The entire structure of modern biology, and every branch of it [is] built around evolution and to teach anything but evolution would be a tremendous disservice to scientific education. If you wanna have one lecture at the end of your year on evolutionary biology, on intelligent design as a way to understand evolution, that’s fine. But the idea that there are these two competing scientific schools is ridiculous.
Indeed. UPDATE: Well, Bush also doesn’t believe that Rafael Palmeiro used steroids.
Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner
More from Foreign Policy

Can Russia Get Used to Being China’s Little Brother?
The power dynamic between Beijing and Moscow has switched dramatically.

Xi and Putin Have the Most Consequential Undeclared Alliance in the World
It’s become more important than Washington’s official alliances today.

It’s a New Great Game. Again.
Across Central Asia, Russia’s brand is tainted by Ukraine, China’s got challenges, and Washington senses another opening.

Iraqi Kurdistan’s House of Cards Is Collapsing
The region once seemed a bright spot in the disorder unleashed by U.S. regime change. Today, things look bleak.