Donald Rumsfeld’s new front in the war on terror
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld gave a speech at the Council on Foreign Relations today about a new front in the war on terror. Blogs are involved: We meet today in the sixth year in which our nation has been engaged in what promises to be a long struggle against an enemy that in many ...
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld gave a speech at the Council on Foreign Relations today about a new front in the war on terror. Blogs are involved: We meet today in the sixth year in which our nation has been engaged in what promises to be a long struggle against an enemy that in many ways is unlike any our country has ever faced. And in this war, some of the most critical battles may not be in the mountains ofAfghanistanor the streets of Iraq, but in newsrooms -- in places like New York, London, Cairo, and elsewhere.... I want to talk today about something that at first might seem obvious -- but isn?t. Our enemies have skillfully adapted to fighting wars in today?s media age, but for the most part we -- our country -- has not -- whether our government, the media or our society generally. Consider that the violent extremists have established ?media relations committees? --and have proven to be highly successful at manipulating opinion elites. They plan and design their headline-grabbing attacks using every means of communications to intimidate and break the collective will of free people. They know that communications transcend borders -- and that a single news story, handled skillfully, can be as damaging to our cause and as helpful to theirs, as any other method of military attack. And they are able to act quickly with relatively few people, and with modest resources compared to the vast -- and expensive -- bureaucracies of western governments. Our federal government is only beginning to adapt our operations for the 21st Century. In fundamental ways, we still function as a ?five and dime? store in an E-Bay world. Today we are fighting the first war in history -- unconventional and irregular as it is -- in an era of... blogs [among other IT-related innovations].... What complicates the ability to respond quickly is that, unlike our enemies, which propagate lies with impunity -- with no penalty whatsoever, our government does not have the luxury of relying on other sources for information -- anonymous or otherwise. Our government has to be the source. And we tell the truth. These new realities have placed unprecedented challenges on members of the press as well. Today?s correspondents are under constant pressure in a hyper competitive media environment to produce exclusives and breaking stories. Daily or weekly deadlines have turned into updates by the hour or even minute -- to feed a constant news crawl that now appears on most cable channels. And the fact is that the federal government -- at the speed at which it operates -- doesn?t always make their job easier.... Let there be no doubt -- the longer it takes to put a strategic communications framework into place, the more we can be certain that the vacuum will be filled by the enemy and by news informers that most assuredly will not paint an accurate picture of what is actually taking place. Whether Donald Rumsfeld is the person best-suited for this kind of combat " in places like New York, London, Cairo" newsrooms, I'll leave to the readers.
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld gave a speech at the Council on Foreign Relations today about a new front in the war on terror. Blogs are involved:
We meet today in the sixth year in which our nation has been engaged in what promises to be a long struggle against an enemy that in many ways is unlike any our country has ever faced. And in this war, some of the most critical battles may not be in the mountains ofAfghanistanor the streets of Iraq, but in newsrooms — in places like New York, London, Cairo, and elsewhere…. I want to talk today about something that at first might seem obvious — but isn?t. Our enemies have skillfully adapted to fighting wars in today?s media age, but for the most part we — our country — has not — whether our government, the media or our society generally. Consider that the violent extremists have established ?media relations committees? –and have proven to be highly successful at manipulating opinion elites. They plan and design their headline-grabbing attacks using every means of communications to intimidate and break the collective will of free people. They know that communications transcend borders — and that a single news story, handled skillfully, can be as damaging to our cause and as helpful to theirs, as any other method of military attack. And they are able to act quickly with relatively few people, and with modest resources compared to the vast — and expensive — bureaucracies of western governments. Our federal government is only beginning to adapt our operations for the 21st Century. In fundamental ways, we still function as a ?five and dime? store in an E-Bay world. Today we are fighting the first war in history — unconventional and irregular as it is — in an era of… blogs [among other IT-related innovations]…. What complicates the ability to respond quickly is that, unlike our enemies, which propagate lies with impunity — with no penalty whatsoever, our government does not have the luxury of relying on other sources for information — anonymous or otherwise. Our government has to be the source. And we tell the truth. These new realities have placed unprecedented challenges on members of the press as well. Today?s correspondents are under constant pressure in a hyper competitive media environment to produce exclusives and breaking stories. Daily or weekly deadlines have turned into updates by the hour or even minute — to feed a constant news crawl that now appears on most cable channels. And the fact is that the federal government — at the speed at which it operates — doesn?t always make their job easier…. Let there be no doubt — the longer it takes to put a strategic communications framework into place, the more we can be certain that the vacuum will be filled by the enemy and by news informers that most assuredly will not paint an accurate picture of what is actually taking place.
Whether Donald Rumsfeld is the person best-suited for this kind of combat ” in places like New York, London, Cairo” newsrooms, I’ll leave to the readers.
Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner
More from Foreign Policy

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.