The troops support the war. Says who?

A couple years back, I read a book about life in the American infantry in Northwestern Europe during WWII called The Boys' Crusade by historian Paul Fussell. Fussell knows something about combat. He led a rifle platoon in the 103rd Infantry Division and was severely wounded in France. In the book, Fussell concludes that "Ninety-nine percent" ...

A couple years back, I read a book about life in the American infantry in Northwestern Europe during WWII called The Boys' Crusade by historian Paul Fussell. Fussell knows something about combat. He led a rifle platoon in the 103rd Infantry Division and was severely wounded in France. In the book, Fussell concludes that "Ninety-nine percent" of American troops "would have escaped if there had been any non-shameful way out." That conclusion shocked me. After all, WWII to this day lends legitimacy to America's role in the world. But it makes sense.

A couple years back, I read a book about life in the American infantry in Northwestern Europe during WWII called The Boys' Crusade by historian Paul Fussell. Fussell knows something about combat. He led a rifle platoon in the 103rd Infantry Division and was severely wounded in France. In the book, Fussell concludes that "Ninety-nine percent" of American troops "would have escaped if there had been any non-shameful way out." That conclusion shocked me. After all, WWII to this day lends legitimacy to America's role in the world. But it makes sense.

That's why the headline of an op-ed by Vets for Freedom Executive Director Wade Zinkle in today's WaPo surprised me. "Troops in Support Of the War," it declares. Zinkle says a majority of troops in Iraq are just having a dandy time in Mesopotamia. Those who are there, he says, want to stay. Those who have returned home want to go back. Zinkle says he is basing this assertion on "what I and others know and hear from our own colleagues."

I thank Zinkle for his service and his sacrifice. But I respectfully disagree with his conclusion. Consider a poll of nearly 1,000 troops serving in Iraq conducted by Zogby International in which 72 percent think the U.S. should get out within a year. Three quarters of reservists and National Guard troops and about half of regular Army troops told Zogby that the U.S. should withdraw from Iraq within six months. I suspect 99 percent would prefer to be at home with their families, loved ones, and friends.

More from Foreign Policy

Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.
Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America

The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.
Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense

If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.
Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War

Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.
An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests

And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.