Iranian democracy “within a decade”

To continue where I left off with Larry Diamond in my last post, I also chatted with him about Iran. Diamond is under no illusions about what the Iranian regime is up to, describing their current activities as an “obvious, frenetic pursuit of nuclear weapons.” But he is surprisingly optimistic about the prospects for reform ...

608819_Azadidown5.jpg
608819_Azadidown5.jpg

To continue where I left off with Larry Diamond in my last post, I also chatted with him about Iran. Diamond is under no illusions about what the Iranian regime is up to, describing their current activities as an “obvious, frenetic pursuit of nuclear weapons.” But he is surprisingly optimistic about the prospects for reform in Iran; arguing that there’s a “good probability” that we might see a democratic Iran within the next ten years or so. 

To continue where I left off with Larry Diamond in my last post, I also chatted with him about Iran. Diamond is under no illusions about what the Iranian regime is up to, describing their current activities as an “obvious, frenetic pursuit of nuclear weapons.” But he is surprisingly optimistic about the prospects for reform in Iran; arguing that there’s a “good probability” that we might see a democratic Iran within the next ten years or so. 

He believes that if “if we bomb [reform is] dead for a decade.” But if we don’t, he sees real opportunities. He points out that, “Ahmadinejad is less effective and less politically potent internally than he may appear and the key to our strategy, in part, has to be to give him enough rope to hang himself.” He notes that Ahmadinejad has proven incredibly incompetent at governing and managing the economy, even managing to create a stock market crash while the oil prices rockets up. This leads him to conclude that “a sophisticated, patient, multi-dimensional, adroit, strategy of dealing with the regime in some ways, while stigmatizing it and fighting a war of ideas in other ways could yield democratic regime change within a decade.” 

The first step, to his mind, should be “direct, comprehensive negotiations with the Iranians in which everything is on the table.” He doesn’t think that the regime would bite but that this approach would “put the regime back up against the wall with its own people” in explaining why they were rejecting the opportunities that the lifting off economic sanctions and the like would bring.

But our track record on Iran, Diamond says, has been terribly weak. For the last 25 years, he observes, U.S. policy toward Iran has been characterized by a “shocking failure of imagination.” 

James Forsyth is assistant editor at Foreign Policy.

More from Foreign Policy

Residents evacuated from Shebekino and other Russian towns near the border with Ukraine are seen in a temporary shelter in Belgorod, Russia, on June 2.
Residents evacuated from Shebekino and other Russian towns near the border with Ukraine are seen in a temporary shelter in Belgorod, Russia, on June 2.

Russians Are Unraveling Before Our Eyes

A wave of fresh humiliations has the Kremlin struggling to control the narrative.

Chinese President Xi Jinping (R) and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva shake hands in Beijing.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (R) and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva shake hands in Beijing.

A BRICS Currency Could Shake the Dollar’s Dominance

De-dollarization’s moment might finally be here.

Keri Russell as Kate Wyler in an episode of The Diplomat
Keri Russell as Kate Wyler in an episode of The Diplomat

Is Netflix’s ‘The Diplomat’ Factual or Farcical?

A former U.S. ambassador, an Iran expert, a Libya expert, and a former U.K. Conservative Party advisor weigh in.

An illustration shows the faces of Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin interrupted by wavy lines of a fragmented map of Europe and Asia.
An illustration shows the faces of Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin interrupted by wavy lines of a fragmented map of Europe and Asia.

The Battle for Eurasia

China, Russia, and their autocratic friends are leading another epic clash over the world’s largest landmass.