What would the Dems do differently? Surprisingly little.
Madeleine Albright’s new book The Mighty and the Almighty: Reflections on America, God and World Affairs is out today and you can read an excerpt here and key quotes here. I recommend giving the whole thing a read. (And I’m not just saying that because I learned today that Albright could leg press three of your humble correspondent.) Albright ...
Madeleine Albright’s new book The Mighty and the Almighty: Reflections on America, God and World Affairs is out today and you can read an excerpt here and key quotes here. I recommend giving the whole thing a read. (And I’m not just saying that because I learned today that Albright could leg press three of your humble correspondent.)
Albright is the wise woman of the Democratic Party on national security. Her prestigious Georgetown salon operates as a crash course in international relations for Dems with presidential ambitions. So, her work on the role of religion in foreign policy is required reading for anyone who wants to understand what a Democratic administration would do differently. After finishing it, the conclusion I came to was: surprisingly little. Yes, Albright bashes the Bush administration for Iraq, Guantanamo, and its religiously tinged language. But when she starts talking about the future rather than the past, she sounds none too different from her father’s most famous -- and favorite -- pupil, Condoleezza Rice. Albright’s call to “blend realism with idealism,” by promoting democracy at a gradual pace, wouldn’t sound out of place in any of Rice’s speeches about the administration’s goals in the Middle East. All of which suggests that, the democratizing baby won’t be thrown out with the Bush bath water and supports Jai's argument that Middle Eastern tyrants hoping to wait out Bush are wasting their time.
The book also contains some interesting policy proposals. One that struck me as particularly smart is that the State Department should institute a cadre of religion experts to offer specialist advice in the way that the nonproliferation and human rights specialists do. If you buy the book make sure to read the footnotes. They are stuffed full of political jabs and witty anecdotes. For those who can’t get enough of Albright, there will be another book along soon: An illustrated guide to her collection of decorative pins.
Albright is the wise woman of the Democratic Party on national security. Her prestigious Georgetown salon operates as a crash course in international relations for Dems with presidential ambitions. So, her work on the role of religion in foreign policy is required reading for anyone who wants to understand what a Democratic administration would do differently. After finishing it, the conclusion I came to was: surprisingly little. Yes, Albright bashes the Bush administration for Iraq, Guantanamo, and its religiously tinged language. But when she starts talking about the future rather than the past, she sounds none too different from her father’s most famous — and favorite — pupil, Condoleezza Rice. Albright’s call to “blend realism with idealism,” by promoting democracy at a gradual pace, wouldn’t sound out of place in any of Rice’s speeches about the administration’s goals in the Middle East. All of which suggests that, the democratizing baby won’t be thrown out with the Bush bath water and supports Jai’s argument that Middle Eastern tyrants hoping to wait out Bush are wasting their time.
The book also contains some interesting policy proposals. One that struck me as particularly smart is that the State Department should institute a cadre of religion experts to offer specialist advice in the way that the nonproliferation and human rights specialists do. If you buy the book make sure to read the footnotes. They are stuffed full of political jabs and witty anecdotes. For those who can’t get enough of Albright, there will be another book along soon: An illustrated guide to her collection of decorative pins.
More from Foreign Policy
Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.
So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.
Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.
Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
