Meddling in Mogadishu
The situation in Somalia, as described by a U.S. intelligence official, is a "Hobbesian" and "enemy-of-my-enemy" situation. Very nice adjectives are peppered throughout this must-read by Emily Wax and Karen DeYoung. The headline is "U.S. Secretly Backing Warlords in Somalia." Kind of weird because it's not such a secret anymore. And this is entirely predictable. ...
The situation in Somalia, as described by a U.S. intelligence official, is a "Hobbesian" and "enemy-of-my-enemy" situation. Very nice adjectives are peppered throughout this must-read by Emily Wax and Karen DeYoung.
The situation in Somalia, as described by a U.S. intelligence official, is a "Hobbesian" and "enemy-of-my-enemy" situation. Very nice adjectives are peppered throughout this must-read by Emily Wax and Karen DeYoung.
The headline is "U.S. Secretly Backing Warlords in Somalia." Kind of weird because it's not such a secret anymore. And this is entirely predictable. Al Qaeda thrives on chaotic places where they can do their thing without pesky things like laws and governments in their way. So here's the basic story:
More than a decade after U.S. troops withdrew from Somalia following a disastrous military intervention, officials of Somalia's interim government and some U.S. analysts of Africa policy say the United States has returned to the African country, secretly supporting secular warlords who have been waging fierce battles against Islamic groups for control of the capital, Mogadishu.
This has some people worried, for several reasons. There's an interrim "government" that in an ideal world Washington would get behind, prop up, help out, etc. But short-termism is the order of the day in Africa policy. And, while we can do more than one thing at a time, it's easy to see why we've chosen just to suck it up an support some nasty warlords who are better than even nastier warlords. We did it in Afghanistan. As always, the regional experts are probably right even if the political reality means something else has to be done (note to self: keep growing cynicism in check).
Africa researchers said they were concerned that while the Bush administration was focused on the potential terrorist threat, little was being done to support economic development initiatives that could provide alternative livelihoods to picking up a gun or following extremist ideologies in Somalia. Somalia watchers and Somalis themselves said there has not been enough substantial backing for building a new government after 15 years of collapsed statehood.
More from Foreign Policy
Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.
The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.
Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.
How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
