Nationalism comes from behind!!
Ah, just as Europe takes a step to reject economic nationalism, we turn back to Latin America. The Financial Times‘ Andy Webb-Vidal reports that the U.S. Southern Command is worried about “resource nationalism” in the region: Future supplies of oil from Latin America are at risk because of the spread of resource nationalism, a study ...
Ah, just as Europe takes a step to reject economic nationalism, we turn back to Latin America. The Financial Times' Andy Webb-Vidal reports that the U.S. Southern Command is worried about "resource nationalism" in the region: Future supplies of oil from Latin America are at risk because of the spread of resource nationalism, a study by the US military that reflects growing concerns in the US administration over energy security has found. An internal report prepared by the US military?s Southern Command and obtained by the Financial Times follows a recent US congressional investigation that warned of the US?s vulnerability to Venezuelan President Hugo Ch?vez?s repeated threats to ?cut off? oil shipments to the US. The Southern Command analysis cautions that the extension of state control over energy production in several countries is deterring investment essential to increase and sustain oil output in the long term. ?A re-emergence of state control in the energy sector will likely increase inefficiencies and, beyond an increase in short-term profits, will hamper efforts to increase long-term supplies and production,? the report said. So far this year, Venezuela has moved to double the level of taxes levied on oil production units operated by multinationals, Bolivia has nationalised its oil and gas fields, and Ecuador has seized several oilfields from Occidental Petroleum, the largest foreign oil company in the country. The report also noted that oil production in Mexico, which faces elections next weekend, is stagnating be-cause of constitutional re-strictions on foreign investment. Latin America accounts for 8.4 per cent of daily world oil output, according to the US Energy Information Administration, but energy supplies from the region make up 30 per cent of US energy imports, or about 4m barrels a day.... That the US Southern Command, which oversees military relations with Latin America, has embarked on a detailed study of the subject underscores the view that energy has become a key facet of US national security. ?It is incumbent upon the command to contemplate beyond strictly military matters,? said Colonel Joe Nu?ez, professor of strategy at the US Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. An exception to the trend, the Southern Command study noted, is Trinidad & Tobago, whose policy of opening its doors to foreign investment has allowed it to become the top supplier of Liquefied Natural Gas to the US. Analysts have warned that, while the wave of resource nationalism in Latin America is allowing governments to grab a greater share of the energy price boom, tighter control will curb output in the future if, or when, oil prices fall. ?Pending any favourable changes to the investment climate,? the Southern Command study concluded, ?the prospects for long-term energy production in Venezuela, Ecuador and Mexico are currently at risk.?
Ah, just as Europe takes a step to reject economic nationalism, we turn back to Latin America. The Financial Times‘ Andy Webb-Vidal reports that the U.S. Southern Command is worried about “resource nationalism” in the region:
Future supplies of oil from Latin America are at risk because of the spread of resource nationalism, a study by the US military that reflects growing concerns in the US administration over energy security has found. An internal report prepared by the US military?s Southern Command and obtained by the Financial Times follows a recent US congressional investigation that warned of the US?s vulnerability to Venezuelan President Hugo Ch?vez?s repeated threats to ?cut off? oil shipments to the US. The Southern Command analysis cautions that the extension of state control over energy production in several countries is deterring investment essential to increase and sustain oil output in the long term. ?A re-emergence of state control in the energy sector will likely increase inefficiencies and, beyond an increase in short-term profits, will hamper efforts to increase long-term supplies and production,? the report said. So far this year, Venezuela has moved to double the level of taxes levied on oil production units operated by multinationals, Bolivia has nationalised its oil and gas fields, and Ecuador has seized several oilfields from Occidental Petroleum, the largest foreign oil company in the country. The report also noted that oil production in Mexico, which faces elections next weekend, is stagnating be-cause of constitutional re-strictions on foreign investment. Latin America accounts for 8.4 per cent of daily world oil output, according to the US Energy Information Administration, but energy supplies from the region make up 30 per cent of US energy imports, or about 4m barrels a day…. That the US Southern Command, which oversees military relations with Latin America, has embarked on a detailed study of the subject underscores the view that energy has become a key facet of US national security. ?It is incumbent upon the command to contemplate beyond strictly military matters,? said Colonel Joe Nu?ez, professor of strategy at the US Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. An exception to the trend, the Southern Command study noted, is Trinidad & Tobago, whose policy of opening its doors to foreign investment has allowed it to become the top supplier of Liquefied Natural Gas to the US. Analysts have warned that, while the wave of resource nationalism in Latin America is allowing governments to grab a greater share of the energy price boom, tighter control will curb output in the future if, or when, oil prices fall. ?Pending any favourable changes to the investment climate,? the Southern Command study concluded, ?the prospects for long-term energy production in Venezuela, Ecuador and Mexico are currently at risk.?
Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner
More from Foreign Policy
What Putin Got Right
The Russian president got many things wrong about invading Ukraine—but not everything.
Russia Has Already Lost in the Long Run
Even if Moscow holds onto territory, the war has wrecked its future.
China’s Belt and Road to Nowhere
Xi Jinping’s signature foreign policy is a “shadow of its former self.”
The U.S. Overreacted to the Chinese Spy Balloon. That Scares Me.
So unused to being challenged, the United States has become so filled with anxiety over China that sober responses are becoming nearly impossible.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
