Bush at the United Nations
George W. Bush took to the podium at the United Nations today buoyed by a 44 percent approval rating and a growing sense that the Republicans might just survive the mid-terms – but also three-quarters of an hour late. (It somehow says it all about the United Nations that, even on the first morning of ...
George W. Bush took to the podium at the United Nations today buoyed by a 44 percent approval rating and a growing sense that the Republicans might just survive the mid-terms - but also three-quarters of an hour late. (It somehow says it all about the United Nations that, even on the first morning of speeches to the General Assembly, it is running behind schedule).
The address was delivered in a more circumspect manner than some of his previous remarks to the General Assembly. The message, though, was the same: There’s a great ideological struggle between freedom-loving moderates and violence-loving extremists and the world needs to pick sides. In a nice touch, Bush used the United Nations’ own Universal Declaration on Human Rights—written by a Lebanese citizen—to make the point that all human beings deserve to live in liberty. But Bush did seem to make a concession to pragmatism with the line that “[e]very nation that travels the road to freedom moves at a different pace.”
Much of the speech was given over to talking directly to the people of the Muslim world. The Iran section, in which he stressed the United States’ “respect” for Iran and its history and culture and that it had “no objection to Iran’s pursuit of a truly peaceful nuclear power program,” was well crafted. It was also smart to try and tap into Iranian discontent over the dire economic situation and the amount of money Ahmadinejad is funneling to Hezbollah.
The harshest language, though, was reserved not for the Iranian regime, but the Syrians. More after the JUMP.
Bush announced to the Syrian people that their government was turning them into “a tool of Iran.” On Israel/Palestine, Bush took the opportunity to reiterate his support for a two-state solution, calling it “one of the great objectives of my presidency.” Bush was strong on Darfur, calling it “genocide” and announcing a new presidential envoy, Andrew Natsios. We shall, though, have to wait and see if this brings about any real improvements on the ground.
Summing up the United States’ position, Bush proclaimed that “our country desires peace” and that “[w]e respect Islam but we will protect our people from those who pervert Islam to sow death and destruction.” Expect to hear the word “protect” as many times between now and November as we’ll hear “respect” at Turtle Bay this week.
More from Foreign Policy
Chinese Hospitals Are Housing Another Deadly Outbreak
Authorities are covering up the spread of antibiotic-resistant pneumonia.
Henry Kissinger, Colossus on the World Stage
The late statesman was a master of realpolitik—whom some regarded as a war criminal.
The West’s False Choice in Ukraine
The crossroads is not between war and compromise, but between victory and defeat.
Washington wants to get tough on China, and the leaders of the House China Committee are in the driver’s seat.