Iraq and the six month fallacy

Jackson Diehl's column in today's Post is spot on. There's something unreal about the insistence that the next six months or year will be decisive in Iraq. Some bloggers even have a term for it: They named the six-month interval a "Friedman" after a certain New York Times columnist's predilection for creating—and shifting—arbitrary deadlines on ...

By , a professor at Indiana University’s Hamilton Lugar School of Global and International Studies.

Jackson Diehl's column in today's Post is spot on. There's something unreal about the insistence that the next six months or year will be decisive in Iraq. Some bloggers even have a term for it: They named the six-month interval a "Friedman" after a certain New York Times columnist's predilection for creating—and shifting—arbitrary deadlines on Iraq. 

Jackson Diehl's column in today's Post is spot on. There's something unreal about the insistence that the next six months or year will be decisive in Iraq. Some bloggers even have a term for it: They named the six-month interval a "Friedman" after a certain New York Times columnist's predilection for creating—and shifting—arbitrary deadlines on Iraq. 

In Washington's bipartisan mind-set, the next six months are always crucial in Iraq. Persistently, we believe that one big, intense effort will turn the country around — or make it possible for us to leave…Iraq, however, doesn't operate on Washington's clock — something Iraqi leaders have repeatedly tried and failed to explain to the ambassadors and generals who demand benchmarks and timetables.

And as Diehl points out, it's a fallacy that has haunted other American leaders in other contexts; the Clinton administration had similarly delusional timetables in the Balkans. The troubling question that the piece leaves unanswered, however, is whether the delusion is a necessary one. Is convincing ourselves that change is right around the corner the only way to stay on the road?

David Bosco is a professor at Indiana University’s Hamilton Lugar School of Global and International Studies. He is the author of The Poseidon Project: The Struggle to Govern the World’s Oceans. Twitter: @multilateralist

More from Foreign Policy

Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.
Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America

The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.
Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense

If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.
Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War

Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.
An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests

And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.