A post in which I agree with the European Commission
Tobias Buck reports in the Financial Times that the European Commission has decided it wants the rest of the world to look more like Brusels: Brussels wants the rest of the world to adopt the European Union?s regulations, the European Commission will say this week. A Commission policy paper that examines the future of the ...
Tobias Buck reports in the Financial Times that the European Commission has decided it wants the rest of the world to look more like Brusels: Brussels wants the rest of the world to adopt the European Union?s regulations, the European Commission will say this week. A Commission policy paper that examines the future of the Union?s single market says European single market rules have inspired global standard-setting in areas such as product safety, the environment, securities and corporate governance. ?Increasingly the world is looking to Europe and adopts the standards that are set here,? the paper, seen by the Financial Times, says. The paper calls on the EU to encourage other jurisdictions to follow suit ? for example by ?promoting European standards internationally through international organisation and bilateral agreements?. This strategy, it claims, will help European businesses beat their rivals abroad since it ?works to the advantage of those already geared up to meet these standards?. The EU?s drive to establish itself as the pacesetter for worldwide business regulation could well lead the bloc into conflict with the US and other trading partners. US officials have often voiced concern about the Union?s growing clout as a global standard-setter, and the two sides have clashed over issues such as rules for the chemicals industry and the EU?s stance on genetically modified foods.... The two sides have very different regulatory philosophies, with the EU placing a heavy emphasis on consumer protection and environmental legislation while the US tends to promote a more market-based approach. Some critics of the European approach argue that the Union?s stance on issues such as GM foods may also reflect a desire to protect the region?s commercial interests. However, as the Commission paper points out, the sheer size and wealth of the Union?s single market mean that few corporations can afford to ignore it. By harmonising the rules for a market boasting 500m consumers, the Union has set standards ?which partners then have to meet if they are to benefit from the single market?, it says. ?[The single market] gives the EU the potential to shape global norms and to ensure that fair rules are applied to worldwide trade and investment. The single market of the future should be the launch pad of an ambitious global agenda.? The EU deciding to throw around its market weight? This sounds very, very familiar.
Tobias Buck reports in the Financial Times that the European Commission has decided it wants the rest of the world to look more like Brusels:
Brussels wants the rest of the world to adopt the European Union?s regulations, the European Commission will say this week. A Commission policy paper that examines the future of the Union?s single market says European single market rules have inspired global standard-setting in areas such as product safety, the environment, securities and corporate governance. ?Increasingly the world is looking to Europe and adopts the standards that are set here,? the paper, seen by the Financial Times, says. The paper calls on the EU to encourage other jurisdictions to follow suit ? for example by ?promoting European standards internationally through international organisation and bilateral agreements?. This strategy, it claims, will help European businesses beat their rivals abroad since it ?works to the advantage of those already geared up to meet these standards?. The EU?s drive to establish itself as the pacesetter for worldwide business regulation could well lead the bloc into conflict with the US and other trading partners. US officials have often voiced concern about the Union?s growing clout as a global standard-setter, and the two sides have clashed over issues such as rules for the chemicals industry and the EU?s stance on genetically modified foods…. The two sides have very different regulatory philosophies, with the EU placing a heavy emphasis on consumer protection and environmental legislation while the US tends to promote a more market-based approach. Some critics of the European approach argue that the Union?s stance on issues such as GM foods may also reflect a desire to protect the region?s commercial interests. However, as the Commission paper points out, the sheer size and wealth of the Union?s single market mean that few corporations can afford to ignore it. By harmonising the rules for a market boasting 500m consumers, the Union has set standards ?which partners then have to meet if they are to benefit from the single market?, it says. ?[The single market] gives the EU the potential to shape global norms and to ensure that fair rules are applied to worldwide trade and investment. The single market of the future should be the launch pad of an ambitious global agenda.?
The EU deciding to throw around its market weight? This sounds very, very familiar.
Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner
More from Foreign Policy
Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.
The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.
Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.
How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
