Iran plays footsie and wins
KHALED DESOUKI/AFP After a week of deadlock, the standoff at the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty meeting was resolved Tuesday … by a footnote. Iran had balked at a phrase in the agenda stressing the “need for full compliance with” the NPT treaty. Just as it seemed likely that the conference would effectively end if nothing happened ...
KHALED DESOUKI/AFP
After a week of deadlock, the standoff at the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty meeting was resolved Tuesday … by a footnote. Iran had balked at a phrase in the agenda stressing the “need for full compliance with” the NPT treaty. Just as it seemed likely that the conference would effectively end if nothing happened by Tuesday morning, Iran acceded to a compromise submitted by South Africa. The magic solution? A simple footnote making explicit that the contested phrase refers to all aspects of the treaty, including those that require major nuclear powers like the United States to disarm.
Silly as it sounds, this was actually a rather clever solution. Iran got the clarification it desired, while others avoided setting a precedent for changing an agenda text and saved the conference from being a complete waste of time. Now, the agenda can move forward on disarmament, setting up a nuclear-free zone in the Middle East, and compliance with NPT safeguards.
Even if the agenda antics were initially the product of confusion in Tehran, Iran appears to have recovered its usual diplomatic finesse. The country was certainly tarred as obstructionist, but it also benefited in at least two important ways. Leaving just two days for the conferees to deal with substantive issues, Iran has minimized the amount of time available for criticism of its own nuclear program. And by waiting for non-aligned South Africa to introduce a compromise, Iran placated its own supporters and avoided bowing to pressure from the West and its allies. This conference was not a resounding victory for Iran, but it does have successes to celebrate.
Eric Hundman is a science fellow at the Center for Defense Information. His research focuses on emerging technology, terrorism and nuclear policy, including the conventionalization of nuclear forces. He contributes a series of posts for Passport on nuclear technology called “Nuke Notes.”
More from Foreign Policy


No, the World Is Not Multipolar
The idea of emerging power centers is popular but wrong—and could lead to serious policy mistakes.


America Prepares for a Pacific War With China It Doesn’t Want
Embedded with U.S. forces in the Pacific, I saw the dilemmas of deterrence firsthand.


America Can’t Stop China’s Rise
And it should stop trying.


The Morality of Ukraine’s War Is Very Murky
The ethical calculations are less clear than you might think.