A very different kind of chemical warfare
Can you handle the truth? Rumors have been floating around for years, but the Pentagon has finally fessed up. The U.S. military seriously considered, then abandoned, a project for a "gay bomb"—a chemical weapon packed with hormones that would turn enemy soldiers into lovers, not fighters. Gives new meaning to the Enola Gay. It might ...
Can you handle the truth? Rumors have been floating around for years, but the Pentagon has finally fessed up. The U.S. military seriously considered, then abandoned, a project for a "gay bomb"—a chemical weapon packed with hormones that would turn enemy soldiers into lovers, not fighters. Gives new meaning to the Enola Gay. It might sound like some wacky 1950s Cold War experiment, but no, this was only 13 years ago, one year after Bill Clinton's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy was implemented.
Can you handle the truth? Rumors have been floating around for years, but the Pentagon has finally fessed up. The U.S. military seriously considered, then abandoned, a project for a "gay bomb"—a chemical weapon packed with hormones that would turn enemy soldiers into lovers, not fighters. Gives new meaning to the Enola Gay. It might sound like some wacky 1950s Cold War experiment, but no, this was only 13 years ago, one year after Bill Clinton's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy was implemented.
The Sunshine Project, an Austin, Texas and Hamburg, Germany-based NGO that works on biological weapons issues, used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain documents from the Air Force's Wright Lab in Dayton, Ohio, which confirmed that in 1994, the lab asked for $7.5 million to fund the development of such unconventional weapons. This much has been known since at least 2005. But new details have come to light. According to Wright Lab's proposal,
One distasteful but completely non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior."
That idea was only one of many "creative" endeavors that the lab proposed. Another idea was a bomb that would make enemies particularly flatulent, so they could be detected from far away.
In fairness to the U.S. military, the proposal did ultimately fail to pass muster. But just imagine what could have been: Members of al Qaeda, ready to do battle, instead fall sweaty and panting into the arms of their irresistible fellow mujahedin for some sweet, sweet lovin'.
(Hat tip: KPIX)
More from Foreign Policy

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.