Jack Sparrow, democrat
There’s no doubt anymore about the influence of Freakonomics on the dismal science. Authors Steven Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner made economics seem clever again by pointing out the everyday connections and correlations you never thought to investigate. It’s a feat that Noam Scheiber over at The New Republic recently lamented, arguing that the success ...
There's no doubt anymore about the influence of Freakonomics on the dismal science. Authors Steven Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner made economics seem clever again by pointing out the everyday connections and correlations you never thought to investigate. It's a feat that Noam Scheiber over at The New Republic recently lamented, arguing that the success of Freakonomics will lead future generations of economists to eschew the hard, time-consuming questions of our day for the cutesy, best-selling studies that, in the end, only serve to disappoint kids who are begging for that backyard swimming pool (In the book, Levitt and Dubner argue that backyard pools are actually more dangerous than guns).
I, for one, sort of love the slightly wacky economics papers that are coming out in the wake of Freakonomics, if only because one day we were bound to get something on the economics of pirate organization.
Peter Leeson of West Virginia University examined centuries-old texts to discern why pirates behaved the way they do, and surprise, surprise: Not only were pirates quite rational beings, but they put in place lasting democratic checks and balances long before England or the United States established their democracies. They even had constitutions to enforce the law and make the terms of "pirate compensation" explicit. Another fascinating little tidbit: Pirate ships were incredibly racially diverse. In the early 18th century, black crew members on pirate ships constituted, on average, nearly 39 percent. Leeson will publish the finale to this three-part look at pirate economics this fall. I just wonder what he'd say about our modern-day sea dogs.
There’s no doubt anymore about the influence of Freakonomics on the dismal science. Authors Steven Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner made economics seem clever again by pointing out the everyday connections and correlations you never thought to investigate. It’s a feat that Noam Scheiber over at The New Republic recently lamented, arguing that the success of Freakonomics will lead future generations of economists to eschew the hard, time-consuming questions of our day for the cutesy, best-selling studies that, in the end, only serve to disappoint kids who are begging for that backyard swimming pool (In the book, Levitt and Dubner argue that backyard pools are actually more dangerous than guns).
I, for one, sort of love the slightly wacky economics papers that are coming out in the wake of Freakonomics, if only because one day we were bound to get something on the economics of pirate organization.
Peter Leeson of West Virginia University examined centuries-old texts to discern why pirates behaved the way they do, and surprise, surprise: Not only were pirates quite rational beings, but they put in place lasting democratic checks and balances long before England or the United States established their democracies. They even had constitutions to enforce the law and make the terms of “pirate compensation” explicit. Another fascinating little tidbit: Pirate ships were incredibly racially diverse. In the early 18th century, black crew members on pirate ships constituted, on average, nearly 39 percent. Leeson will publish the finale to this three-part look at pirate economics this fall. I just wonder what he’d say about our modern-day sea dogs.
More from Foreign Policy
Xi’s Great Leap Backward
Beijing is running out of recipes for its looming jobs crisis—and reviving Mao-era policies.
Companies Are Fleeing China for Friendlier Shores
“Friendshoring” is the new trend as geopolitics bites.
Why Superpower Crises Are a Good Thing
A new era of tensions will focus minds and break logjams, as Cold War history shows.
The Mediterranean as We Know It Is Vanishing
From Saint-Tropez to Amalfi, the region’s most attractive tourist destinations are also its most vulnerable.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today from Foreign Policy’s newsletter writer Colm Quinn.
By signing up, I agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to occasionally receive special offers from Foreign Policy.
