Last chance to vote for seven new Wonders of the World
Sean Gallup/Getty Images News The original list of the seven wonders of the world was compiled in 140 B.C. by a small group of scholars at the Museum of Alexandria in Egypt. Now, a new list of the world’s seven wonders is being put to a vote by the world’s people. So far, 90 million ...
Sean Gallup/Getty Images News
The original list of the seven wonders of the world was compiled in 140 B.C. by a small group of scholars at the Museum of Alexandria in Egypt. Now, a new list of the world's seven wonders is being put to a vote by the world's people. So far, 90 million people across the globe have voted. If you haven't yet cast your ballot, you have until 7 p.m. EST to vote for your top seven of the 21 candidates. (Warning: The New Seven Wonders site seems to be having trouble due to the last-minute rush of voting.)
In a world of American Idol-type TV shows, the contest raises the age-old question of whether artistic and historical value can be put to a popular vote. And sure enough, the campaign for an updated list of world wonders, initiated by a Swiss filmmaker, has generated plenty of controversy.
The original list of the seven wonders of the world was compiled in 140 B.C. by a small group of scholars at the Museum of Alexandria in Egypt. Now, a new list of the world’s seven wonders is being put to a vote by the world’s people. So far, 90 million people across the globe have voted. If you haven’t yet cast your ballot, you have until 7 p.m. EST to vote for your top seven of the 21 candidates. (Warning: The New Seven Wonders site seems to be having trouble due to the last-minute rush of voting.)
In a world of American Idol–type TV shows, the contest raises the age-old question of whether artistic and historical value can be put to a popular vote. And sure enough, the campaign for an updated list of world wonders, initiated by a Swiss filmmaker, has generated plenty of controversy.
Egypt said that the Pyramids of Giza shouldn’t have to compete to be on the list since they were on the original list of world wonders. As a result, the pyramids were given an honorary place on the list, so there will actually be eight wonders when the competition ends. Meanwhile, the Vatican alleges an anti-Christian bias because structures such as the Sistine Chapel weren’t selected as candidates. And UNESCO, which is not connected to the contest, said the selection method is unscientific, and voting will be based on nationalism.
The results will be announced Saturday, so we’ll find out if UNESCO is right.
More from Foreign Policy


Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.


So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.


Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.


Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.