Seven Questions: Step on Iraq, Break Your Party’s Back
A growing number of prominent Republicans are speaking out about an Iraq war that most Americans no longer think is winnable. FP spoke with former top Bush political advisor Matthew Dowd about why a party once deeply loyal to U.S. President George W. Bush is now coming apart at the seams.
BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/Getty Images NewsExit strategist: Influential Republican Senator Richard Lugar may not be ready to sign on to a full withdrawal just yet, but his patience with the presidents policy is clearly exhausted.
BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/Getty Images NewsExit strategist: Influential Republican Senator Richard Lugar may not be ready to sign on to a full withdrawal just yet, but his patience with the presidents policy is clearly exhausted.
FOREIGN POLICY: Whos running the show in the U.S. administration regarding Iraq? Is it Vice President Dick Cheney? Defense Secretary Robert Gates? Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice? Or is it the president?
Matthew Dowd: (Laughs.) Well, thats probably not a question for me, as I dont really talk to them anymoreat allsince my New York Times front-page break with the president. So I dont know.
FP: Theres a well-known quote from the president in which he says, We had an accountability moment, and thats called the 2004 elections. Do you believe that the president and the vice president consider themselves to be accountable to the American people?
MD: I dont know what they feel. They may feel like theyre accountable. But in many ways, their actions dont reflect that they think theyre accountable. I can just speculate, but it doesnt look as if they think Congress has a role in this. It has a very strong my way or the highway feel.
FP: The White House has started shifting its rhetoric very delicately in talking about a post-surge Iraq. What should we make of whats going on?
MD: Im sure that theyre trying to make the best of a bad situation, not only a bad on-the-ground situation, but a bad political situation. The American public is on the opposite side of where the administration is. And so, I think that theyre trying to do the best they can in a bad place. They dont have many options left. The public basically has Iraq in its rearview mirror. The public has basically decided, This was unsuccessful; now what can we do going forward? and not, How can we make it a success? And thats a much different place.
FP: Depending on how you ask the questions about withdrawal, though, dont people give different answers? If you nudge people and say, Wouldnt pulling out embolden al Qaeda, dont you see different results?
MD: Theres still a little of that, but theres much less of it today. Everything has converged into, This is a mistake; its not going well; and we need to figure out a process to get out of there. The public basically thinks Iraqs in a mess, and the only thing our soldiers are serving there seems to be as targets. And so the public doesnt know what the mission is.
FP: Recently, a number of prominent Republicans in Congress such as Richard Lugar and Pete Domenici have come forward and broken with the presidents Iraq policy. What do you think is happening? Are they reacting to the polls? These are guys whose seats arent threatened, right?
MD: Theyre speaking out, like I did in April, to say basically that the status quo is not tenable. Theyre doing it not from a political perspective; theyre doing it from a perspective of Were putting our most precious resource on the line, and what are we gaining? Theyre just trying to speak truth to power. I might be a member of the Republican family, but when its not going well, somebodys got to stand up and say, Enoughs enough. They see the reality, and they also know where the public is on this.
FP: But the growing opposition to the Iraq war among Republicans hasnt translated into support for outright withdrawal. Is there a middle ground that people are going to support, somewhere between the surge and withdrawal?
MD: There probably will be, but it will be a nice way to say withdrawal. It will be done in a way that looks measured or rational or supporting the troops. I think the primary driver now is getting our troops out of harms way, not what can we do to secure Iraq? And I think the relationship in the publics mind between securing Iraq and terrorism has been uncoupled. The polls say now that people dont think the Iraq war has made us safer from terrorism.
FP: If you were advising a candidate in 2008(MD: Im not)what would you advise that candidate to say about Iraq?
MD: Well, first, Id always advise a candidate to tell people what he feels and not just make something up. I would also let them know where the public is on this, and that going forward, Iraq is no longer about how we winits about how we overcome the mistakes weve made.
Matthew Dowd was chief strategist for the Bush-Cheney 2004 reelection campaign and is the cofounder of ViaNovo, a management and communications consulting firm.
For other timely interviews with leading world figures and expert analysts, visit FP’s complete Seven Questions Archive.
More from Foreign Policy

Can Russia Get Used to Being China’s Little Brother?
The power dynamic between Beijing and Moscow has switched dramatically.

Xi and Putin Have the Most Consequential Undeclared Alliance in the World
It’s become more important than Washington’s official alliances today.

It’s a New Great Game. Again.
Across Central Asia, Russia’s brand is tainted by Ukraine, China’s got challenges, and Washington senses another opening.

Iraqi Kurdistan’s House of Cards Is Collapsing
The region once seemed a bright spot in the disorder unleashed by U.S. regime change. Today, things look bleak.