Matthew Yglesias agrees with John Bolton
Matt Yglesias doesn’t like the nuclear deal with India: What’s happening in this deal is that we’re granting India concessions related to its nuclear program and India is giving us . . . essentially nothing in exchange…. Meanwhile, from a neoconnish perspective the fact that this undermines the nonproliferation regime is probably a good thing. ...
Matt Yglesias doesn't like the nuclear deal with India: What's happening in this deal is that we're granting India concessions related to its nuclear program and India is giving us . . . essentially nothing in exchange.... Meanwhile, from a neoconnish perspective the fact that this undermines the nonproliferation regime is probably a good thing. They hate the idea that diplomatic agreements might actually work and undermine their efforts to start an endless series of wars.Yeah... there are a few problems with this interpretation. The biggest, of course, is that the biggest neocon involved in the nonproliferation question opposed the India nuclear deal. As for Matt's interpretation of the deal.... I've defended it before, but I'll ask the same question again -- under what set of magical circumstances was India ever going to agree to give up their nuclear weapons? Not everything the Bush administration does is part of the neocon grand plan. Indeed, I think we can all agree that "neocon grand plan" is a really bad joke.
Matt Yglesias doesn’t like the nuclear deal with India:
What’s happening in this deal is that we’re granting India concessions related to its nuclear program and India is giving us . . . essentially nothing in exchange…. Meanwhile, from a neoconnish perspective the fact that this undermines the nonproliferation regime is probably a good thing. They hate the idea that diplomatic agreements might actually work and undermine their efforts to start an endless series of wars.
Yeah… there are a few problems with this interpretation. The biggest, of course, is that the biggest neocon involved in the nonproliferation question opposed the India nuclear deal. As for Matt’s interpretation of the deal…. I’ve defended it before, but I’ll ask the same question again — under what set of magical circumstances was India ever going to agree to give up their nuclear weapons? Not everything the Bush administration does is part of the neocon grand plan. Indeed, I think we can all agree that “neocon grand plan” is a really bad joke.
Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner
More from Foreign Policy

Can Russia Get Used to Being China’s Little Brother?
The power dynamic between Beijing and Moscow has switched dramatically.

Xi and Putin Have the Most Consequential Undeclared Alliance in the World
It’s become more important than Washington’s official alliances today.

It’s a New Great Game. Again.
Across Central Asia, Russia’s brand is tainted by Ukraine, China’s got challenges, and Washington senses another opening.

Iraqi Kurdistan’s House of Cards Is Collapsing
The region once seemed a bright spot in the disorder unleashed by U.S. regime change. Today, things look bleak.