What the Basra precedent says about Iraq
ESSAM AL-SUDANI/AFP/Getty Images Just about everybody active in the Iraq debate will find something in this morning’s Washington Post piece on Basra to hang their hat on. Against the surge? The article describes how Britain’s own mini-surge around Basra in 2006 temporarily reduced the violence but soon fell flat. For the surge? You can point ...
ESSAM AL-SUDANI/AFP/Getty Images
Just about everybody active in the Iraq debate will find something in this morning's Washington Post piece on Basra to hang their hat on.
Against the surge? The article describes how Britain's own mini-surge around Basra in 2006 temporarily reduced the violence but soon fell flat.
Just about everybody active in the Iraq debate will find something in this morning’s Washington Post piece on Basra to hang their hat on.
Against the surge? The article describes how Britain’s own mini-surge around Basra in 2006 temporarily reduced the violence but soon fell flat.
For the surge? You can point to the fact that violence has grown even worse since British troops gave up trying to keep the peace.
The article also provides ammunition to all sides of the debate on Iran’s role. It depicts an Iran that is actively meddling in Basra but is also utterly unable to control events in the surrounding area:
Although neighbor Iran’s presence is pervasive — with cultural influence, humanitarian aid, arms and money — U.S. officials and outside experts think that the Iraqi parties are using Iran more than vice versa. Iraqis in the south have long memories of the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s, one U.S. official said, and when a southern Shiite “wants to tar someone, they call them an Iranian.” He said the United States is “always very concerned about Iranian influence, as well we should be, but there is a difference between influence and control. It would be very difficult for the Iranians to establish control.”
In short, the complicated and shifting picture the article paints is decidedly resistant to simple policy prescription—which makes the piece all the more credible.
David Bosco is a professor at Indiana University’s Hamilton Lugar School of Global and International Studies. He is the author of The Poseidon Project: The Struggle to Govern the World’s Oceans. Twitter: @multilateralist
More from Foreign Policy


Lessons for the Next War
Twelve experts weigh in on how to prevent, deter, and—if necessary—fight the next conflict.


It’s High Time to Prepare for Russia’s Collapse
Not planning for the possibility of disintegration betrays a dangerous lack of imagination.


Turkey Is Sending Cold War-Era Cluster Bombs to Ukraine
The artillery-fired cluster munitions could be lethal to Russian troops—and Ukrainian civilians.


Congrats, You’re a Member of Congress. Now Listen Up.
Some brief foreign-policy advice for the newest members of the U.S. legislature.