If Condi can go to Libya, why not Cuba?
Unilateral sanctions on Cuba are probably the stupidest, least-effective U.S. policy going—and everybody knows it. And yet even though the Cold War is over, the policy stays due to an electoral quirk that has politicians like George W. Bush and Hillary Clinton “pandering to a cabal that has kept US-Cuba ties frozen in a 1960s ...
Unilateral sanctions on Cuba are probably the stupidest, least-effective U.S. policy going—and everybody knows it. And yet even though the Cold War is over, the policy stays due to an electoral quirk that has politicians like George W. Bush and Hillary Clinton "pandering to a cabal that has kept US-Cuba ties frozen in a 1960s cocoon," in the words of Steve Clemons. Cuban expatriates, you see, are a key segment of the vote in the electoral swing state of Florida.
MAHMUD TURKIA/AFP/Getty Images
I mention this because today, Libya proudly announced that U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice will be visiting the country in October, the first such visit since 1953. Many pundits will no doubt beat up on the Bush administration for doing so, and there's plenty of ammunition in Libya's grotesque human rights record or its recent attempt to assassinate the King of Saudi Arabia. And then there's Muammar el-Qaddafi himself, a nutjob who is widely mocked across the Middle East—a region that knows a thing or two about terrible leaders. The mercurial Qaddafi refused to meet with Condi's deputy, John Negroponte, when he visited the country back in April. And still, the rapprochement marches on.
Unilateral sanctions on Cuba are probably the stupidest, least-effective U.S. policy going—and everybody knows it. And yet even though the Cold War is over, the policy stays due to an electoral quirk that has politicians like George W. Bush and Hillary Clinton “pandering to a cabal that has kept US-Cuba ties frozen in a 1960s cocoon,” in the words of Steve Clemons. Cuban expatriates, you see, are a key segment of the vote in the electoral swing state of Florida.
I mention this because today, Libya proudly announced that U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice will be visiting the country in October, the first such visit since 1953. Many pundits will no doubt beat up on the Bush administration for doing so, and there’s plenty of ammunition in Libya’s grotesque human rights record or its recent attempt to assassinate the King of Saudi Arabia. And then there’s Muammar el-Qaddafi himself, a nutjob who is widely mocked across the Middle East—a region that knows a thing or two about terrible leaders. The mercurial Qaddafi refused to meet with Condi’s deputy, John Negroponte, when he visited the country back in April. And still, the rapprochement marches on.
If only the Cubans were sitting on 39 billion barrels of oil reserves, perhaps Condi would meet with them, too.
More from Foreign Policy
Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.
So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.
Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.
Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
