And here I thought “angry Buddhist monks” was an oxymoron

The Financial Times’ Amy Kazmin and Andrew Ward report that Myanmar’s regime is so bad that they’ve actually managed to make Budshist monks angry. Apparently, you wouldn’t like them when they’re angry: Burma?s military regime fulminated on Friday against ?external anti-government groups? which it claimed were trying to foment a mass uprising in Burma, and ...

By , a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast.

The Financial Times' Amy Kazmin and Andrew Ward report that Myanmar's regime is so bad that they've actually managed to make Budshist monks angry. Apparently, you wouldn't like them when they're angry: Burma?s military regime fulminated on Friday against ?external anti-government groups? which it claimed were trying to foment a mass uprising in Burma, and warned that it remains determined to crush open displays of dissent.... The regime?s outburst came amid persistent high tensions in the town of Pokkoku, a centre of Buddhist learning, where angry Buddhist monks have clashed with government authorities and pro-regime supporters in recent days.... Burma?s ruling generals are on edge after a rare wave of small but persistent protests against a sudden sharp increase in the price of rationed fuel, which has exacerbated the hardships of the impoverished population. Initially, the regime relied mainly on its civilian militias ? with frightening names like Swan-aah Shin, or ?Masters of Force? ? to help police and other security forces to haul off demonstrators, and snuff out protests and marches almost as soon as they began. But tensions have intensified since Wednesday night when soldiers in Pokkoku fired warning shots over the heads of hundreds of protesting monks, who complained of being manhandled, and tied to electricity poles. On Thursday, monks infuriated at the harsh treatment held a dozen government officials captive in a tense standoff, and burned four official cars, before freeing the group unharmed a few hours later. However, later monks and town residents destroyed an electronics shop and a home that belong to members of the regime?s Union Solidarity and Development Organisation, reflecting the strength of public anger towards any one seen as linked to the regime. More than 100 people have been arrested by the regime in an attempt to quell the protests.

The Financial Times’ Amy Kazmin and Andrew Ward report that Myanmar’s regime is so bad that they’ve actually managed to make Budshist monks angry. Apparently, you wouldn’t like them when they’re angry:

Burma?s military regime fulminated on Friday against ?external anti-government groups? which it claimed were trying to foment a mass uprising in Burma, and warned that it remains determined to crush open displays of dissent…. The regime?s outburst came amid persistent high tensions in the town of Pokkoku, a centre of Buddhist learning, where angry Buddhist monks have clashed with government authorities and pro-regime supporters in recent days…. Burma?s ruling generals are on edge after a rare wave of small but persistent protests against a sudden sharp increase in the price of rationed fuel, which has exacerbated the hardships of the impoverished population. Initially, the regime relied mainly on its civilian militias ? with frightening names like Swan-aah Shin, or ?Masters of Force? ? to help police and other security forces to haul off demonstrators, and snuff out protests and marches almost as soon as they began. But tensions have intensified since Wednesday night when soldiers in Pokkoku fired warning shots over the heads of hundreds of protesting monks, who complained of being manhandled, and tied to electricity poles. On Thursday, monks infuriated at the harsh treatment held a dozen government officials captive in a tense standoff, and burned four official cars, before freeing the group unharmed a few hours later. However, later monks and town residents destroyed an electronics shop and a home that belong to members of the regime?s Union Solidarity and Development Organisation, reflecting the strength of public anger towards any one seen as linked to the regime. More than 100 people have been arrested by the regime in an attempt to quell the protests.

Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner

Tag: Theory

More from Foreign Policy

Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.
Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America

The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.
Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense

If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.
Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War

Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.
An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests

And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.