Reporters sense Iraq “war fatigue” setting in
MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images The National Press Club on Thursday morning hosted two interesting panel discussions on the Iraq war and the press. Sponsored by Harvard’s Joan Shorenstein Center, the program featured reporters and media experts discussing lessons learned during the war and the relationship between the military and the press. Topics ranged from the role ...
MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images
The National Press Club on Thursday morning hosted two interesting panel discussions on the Iraq war and the press. Sponsored by Harvard's Joan Shorenstein Center, the program featured reporters and media experts discussing lessons learned during the war and the relationship between the military and the press. Topics ranged from the role of patriotism in reporting to constraints of embedded journalism. But the general mood of the talks were summed up by NBC Pentagon correspondent Jim Miklaszewski, who said:
The nation, the government, the Congress, the military and many in the Pentagon are suffering war fatigue.
The National Press Club on Thursday morning hosted two interesting panel discussions on the Iraq war and the press. Sponsored by Harvard’s Joan Shorenstein Center, the program featured reporters and media experts discussing lessons learned during the war and the relationship between the military and the press. Topics ranged from the role of patriotism in reporting to constraints of embedded journalism. But the general mood of the talks were summed up by NBC Pentagon correspondent Jim Miklaszewski, who said:
The nation, the government, the Congress, the military and many in the Pentagon are suffering war fatigue.
He and other panelist said this fatigue makes it difficult to inform readers of the reality on the ground, as people either don’t want to or are sick of hearing about it. We’ll see if the public has the stomach for the eventual pullout and its aftermath, which by all indications will be violent and long.
Another popular point of discussion was the relationship between the press and the Pentagon under Donald Rumsfeld compared with Robert Gates. The panelist said Rumsfeld was antagonistic from the start (I mean, who can forget the briefings in which he questioned reporters’ intelligence?), while Gates has tried to convince the rank and file that the press is not the enemy.
The difference in the relationship between reporters and the military was best expressed in an anecdote from ABC national security correspondent Jonathan Karl. Under Rumsfeld, Karl said, the Pentagon’s “Early Bird” briefing—a daily electronic rundown of all defense-related news—started off with not with the press accounts themselves, but with corrections and letters to the editors (some unpublished), which challenged the stories. In the past, these items usually ran at the bottom of the e-mail, so placing them front and center was an obvious attempt to embarrass reporters for mistakes or for what the Pentagon thought were misleading stories. Now, under Gates, the corrections and letters have returned to their original place.
More from Foreign Policy
Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.
So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.
Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.
Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
