Denounce, reject, tomayto, tomahto?
Tim Russert, one of two moderators for Tuesday night’s debate between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, pressed the latter on his views on the views of Louis Farrakhan. What followed was the only light-hearted moment of an otherwise tense, combative night: The tone settled down thereafter, flaring only briefly when Obama said he “denounced” Minister ...
Tim Russert, one of two moderators for Tuesday night's debate between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, pressed the latter on his views on the views of Louis Farrakhan. What followed was the only light-hearted moment of an otherwise tense, combative night:
Tim Russert, one of two moderators for Tuesday night’s debate between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, pressed the latter on his views on the views of Louis Farrakhan. What followed was the only light-hearted moment of an otherwise tense, combative night:
The tone settled down thereafter, flaring only briefly when Obama said he “denounced” Minister Louis Farrakhan’s long history of anti-Semitic statements but hesitated to “reject” Farrakhan’s support. Clinton said Obama needed to take a stronger stance.
“If Senator Clinton thinks that ‘reject’ is stronger than ‘denounce,’ then I’m happy to concede the point, and I both reject and denounce” Farrakhan’s support, Obama said to scattered laughter in the hall.
More from Foreign Policy

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.