Let’s switch the debates
I’m going to commit FP editor blasphemy right now and say that if tonight’s debate does happen, which is looking more likely today, I hope that they put off the foreign-policy questions for another night and focus solely on the financial crisis and the U.S. economy. The economic debate was scheduled for Oct. 15, but ...
I'm going to commit FP editor blasphemy right now and say that if tonight's debate does happen, which is looking more likely today, I hope that they put off the foreign-policy questions for another night and focus solely on the financial crisis and the U.S. economy. The economic debate was scheduled for Oct. 15, but with this week's headlines, Americans will tune in tonight anxious to hear about how the candidates plan to stave off an economic meltdown. Questions about Iran or Russia, important as they may be, will seem like non sequiturs for many voters right now.
It's almost certain that moderator Jim Lehrer will devote a good portion of the debate to the economy anyway, so why not just switch the two debates and give important foreign-policy questions the full night they deserve on the 15th? I know that the candidates have been preparing for tonight with the assumption that they'd be asked solely about foreign affairs, but that's called thinking on your feet and it should be a requirement for anyone who wants to be president.
Update: It's on!
I’m going to commit FP editor blasphemy right now and say that if tonight’s debate does happen, which is looking more likely today, I hope that they put off the foreign-policy questions for another night and focus solely on the financial crisis and the U.S. economy. The economic debate was scheduled for Oct. 15, but with this week’s headlines, Americans will tune in tonight anxious to hear about how the candidates plan to stave off an economic meltdown. Questions about Iran or Russia, important as they may be, will seem like non sequiturs for many voters right now.
It’s almost certain that moderator Jim Lehrer will devote a good portion of the debate to the economy anyway, so why not just switch the two debates and give important foreign-policy questions the full night they deserve on the 15th? I know that the candidates have been preparing for tonight with the assumption that they’d be asked solely about foreign affairs, but that’s called thinking on your feet and it should be a requirement for anyone who wants to be president.
Update: It’s on!
Joshua Keating was an associate editor at Foreign Policy Twitter: @joshuakeating
More from Foreign Policy
Why Do People Hate Realism So Much?
The school of thought doesn’t explain everything—but its proponents foresaw the potential for conflict over Ukraine long before it erupted.
China’s Crisis of Confidence
What if, instead of being a competitor, China can no longer afford to compete at all?
Why This Global Economic Crisis Is Different
This is the first time since World War II that there may be no cooperative way out.
China Is Hardening Itself for Economic War
Beijing is trying to close economic vulnerabilities out of fear of U.S. containment.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today from Foreign Policy’s newsletter writer Colm Quinn.
By signing up, I agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to occasionally receive special offers from Foreign Policy.